PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDF vs. AALTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITDF vs. AALTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and American Funds 2050 Target Date Retirement Fund (AALTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDF achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than AALTX's 8.28% return.


ITDF

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.17%
6M
7.65%
YTD
10.90%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.48%

AALTX

1D
1.72%
1M
-1.43%
6M
5.46%
YTD
8.28%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
11.44%
ALL TIME*
8.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$205.68K$291.78K$509.52K

ITDF vs. AALTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ITDF
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF
10.90%20.86%16.15%12.92%
AALTX
American Funds 2050 Target Date Retirement Fund
8.28%20.06%15.09%11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDF and AALTX is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023

0.97

The correlation between ITDF and AALTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITDF vs. AALTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITDF
ITDF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ITDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDF Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AALTX
AALTX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AALTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AALTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
AALTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AALTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AALTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITDF vs. AALTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and American Funds 2050 Target Date Retirement Fund (AALTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITDFAALTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

1.74

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

7.49

+2.31

ITDF vs. AALTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDF Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the AALTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDF and AALTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITDF vs. AALTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDF drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, smaller than the maximum AALTX drawdown of -50.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDF and AALTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDFAALTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-50.02%

+34.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-9.45%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-2.22%

+0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-7.13%

+5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.19%

0.00%

Volatility

ITDF vs. AALTX - Volatility Comparison

Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF (ITDF) and American Funds 2050 Target Date Retirement Fund (AALTX) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITDFAALTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.55%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.88%

10.44%

+0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

12.65%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

14.45%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.93%

14.87%

-0.94%

ITDF vs. AALTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDF has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than AALTX's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITDF vs. AALTX - Dividend Comparison

ITDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than AALTX's 5.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AALTX
American Funds 2050 Target Date Retirement Fund
5.37%5.81%3.33%2.36%7.07%4.32%3.13%4.17%4.77%2.36%3.53%4.85%
ITDF
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2050 ETF
1.49%1.65%1.55%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ITDF and AALTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITDF has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to AALTX (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDF dropped -15.67% vs AALTX's -50.02%.

ITDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITDF and AALTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer