PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITDC vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ITDC vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ITDC vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
-0.06%16.10%12.02%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-22.18%-6.41%99.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDC achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -22.18% return.


ITDC

1D
0.56%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
1.66%
1Y
15.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.42%
YTD
-22.18%
6M
-42.10%
1Y
-20.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ITDC vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDC has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ITDC vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDC
ITDC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ITDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITDC Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ITDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITDC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDC vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITDCIBITDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

-0.44

+1.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

-0.37

+2.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

0.96

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

-0.35

+2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.64

-0.75

+9.39

ITDC vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDC and IBIT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITDCIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

-0.44

+1.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.36

+1.29

Correlation

The correlation between ITDC and IBIT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ITDC vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ITDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
ITDC
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF
2.02%2.02%1.93%0.84%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ITDC vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDC drawdown since its inception was -10.39%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDC and IBIT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ITDCIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-49.36%

+38.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.11%

-49.36%

+41.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-45.80%

+41.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.10%

-14.18%

+13.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

23.27%

-21.48%

Volatility

ITDC vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2035 ETF (ITDC) is 4.30%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that ITDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ITDCIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.30%

12.95%

-8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.58%

36.76%

-30.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

45.40%

-33.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.06%

51.21%

-41.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.06%

51.21%

-41.15%