ITDB vs. SLV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ITDB (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDB is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. ITDB is actively managed, while SLV is passively managed. Over the past year, ITDB returned 14.00% vs 58.79% for SLV. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITDB charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.

Performance

ITDB vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITDB achieves a 5.63% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -19.62% return.

ITDB

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 5.63%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 14.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLV

• 1D: -7.09%
• 1M: -24.25%
• YTD: -19.62%
• 6M: -20.61%
• 1Y: 58.79%
• 3Y*: 36.01%
• 5Y*: 16.45%
• 10Y*: 11.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITDB vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	5.63%	14.58%	9.65%	11.73%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	-19.62%	144.66%	20.89%	3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between ITDB and SLV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	0.34

Return for Risk

ITDB vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITDB

ITDB Risk / Return Rank: 63
ITDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ITDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ITDB Omega Ratio Rank: 65
ITDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ITDB Martin Ratio Rank: 66

SLV

SLV Risk / Return Rank: 28
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITDB vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITDB	SLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.86	0.97	+0.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.64	1.40	+1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.22	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	1.16	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	2.66	+8.04

ITDB vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITDB Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITDB and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ITDB vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITDB drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDB and SLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITDB	SLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-76.28%	+67.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.66%	-50.97%	+45.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.97%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.12%	-50.97%	+49.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.94%	-44.66%	+43.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	22.14%	-20.83%

Volatility

ITDB vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF (ITDB) is 2.92%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that ITDB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITDB	SLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	15.67%	-12.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.40%	59.65%	-53.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.60%	60.78%	-53.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.67%	36.73%	-28.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.67%	32.16%	-23.49%

ITDB vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITDB has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITDB vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

ITDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ITDB Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2030 ETF	1.94%	2.05%	1.96%	0.62%
SLV iShares Silver Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITDB and SLV in my portfolio?

ITDB and SLV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITDB or SLV?

SLV has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to ITDB (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDB dropped -8.41% vs SLV's -76.28%.

Which ETF is better, ITDB or SLV?

On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 58.79% vs 14.00% for ITDB. On fees, ITDB is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ITDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITDB or SLV?

Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 58.79% return vs 14.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITDB or SLV?

ITDB is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITDB or SLV?

ITDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.94%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

What is the main difference between ITDB and SLV?

ITDB is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while SLV is Silver. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ITDB and 0.50% for SLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ITDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.