PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITCAX vs. FRDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Asset Intermediate Maturity CA Municipals Fund (ITCAX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITCAX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than FRDPX's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ITCAX has underperformed FRDPX with an annualized return of 1.31%, while FRDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


ITCAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.24%
YTD
1.25%
6M
1.63%
1Y
6.09%
3Y*
3.47%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
1.31%

FRDPX

1D
0.28%
1M
0.99%
YTD
5.43%
6M
4.69%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
11.08%
5Y*
8.83%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ITCAX
Western Asset Intermediate Maturity CA Municipals Fund
1.25%4.92%2.17%4.02%-9.40%1.50%2.27%6.03%1.37%3.99%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
5.43%11.96%10.92%12.10%-10.69%26.62%16.29%29.83%-5.27%17.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ITCAX and FRDPX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1991

0.02

The correlation between ITCAX and FRDPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITCAX vs. FRDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITCAX
ITCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ITCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ITCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Intermediate Maturity CA Municipals Fund (ITCAX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ITCAXFRDPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.25

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.08

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.51

8.12

+1.40

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the FRDPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITCAX and FRDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITCAX drawdown since its inception was -13.38%, smaller than the maximum FRDPX drawdown of -51.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITCAX and FRDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITCAXFRDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-51.57%

+38.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.30%

-7.10%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.11%

-18.26%

+14.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.38%

-21.07%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.38%

-34.89%

+21.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-0.70%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-5.81%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.64%

1.82%

-1.18%

Volatility

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Western Asset Intermediate Maturity CA Municipals Fund (ITCAX) is 0.56%, while Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that ITCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITCAXFRDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

2.79%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

7.86%

-6.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14%

10.26%

-8.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

15.37%

-12.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.54%

17.18%

-13.64%

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITCAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDPX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITCAX vs. FRDPX - Dividend Comparison

ITCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than FRDPX's 9.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
9.70%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%
ITCAX
Western Asset Intermediate Maturity CA Municipals Fund
2.65%3.50%2.65%2.17%1.77%1.49%1.87%2.63%2.96%2.89%2.73%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITCAX and FRDPX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDPX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to ITCAX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITCAX dropped -13.38% vs FRDPX's -51.57%.

ITCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITCAX and FRDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer