ITA vs. WDAF
ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF) and WDAF (WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - ITA tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index while WDAF tracks the WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ITA charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for WDAF.
Performance
ITA vs. WDAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITA achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly lower than WDAF's 11.85% return.
ITA
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- 7.52%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 13.22%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 28.46%
- 5Y*
- 16.61%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
WDAF
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITA vs. WDAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 7.93% | 8.06% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 11.85% | -7.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITA and WDAF is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITA vs. WDAF — Risk / Return Rank
ITA
WDAF
ITA vs. WDAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund (WDAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITA | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITA | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.15 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
ITA vs. WDAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITA drawdown since its inception was -59.72%, which is greater than WDAF's maximum drawdown of -18.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITA and WDAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITA | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.72% | -18.21% | -41.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.53% | -16.06% | +8.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -6.09% | -3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.84% | — | — |
Volatility
ITA vs. WDAF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITA | WDAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.76% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.05% | 32.10% | -11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.06% | 32.10% | -12.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.16% | 32.10% | -8.94% |
ITA vs. WDAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITA has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than WDAF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITA vs. WDAF - Dividend Comparison
ITA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, more than WDAF's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.93% | 0.95% | 0.82% | 1.07% | 1.54% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 1.07% | 1.04% |
WDAF WisdomTree Asia Defense Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITA and WDAF have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITA is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITA is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDAF.
ITA has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.12% for WDAF.
ITA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index, while WDAF tracks WisdomTree Asia Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for ITA and 0.45% for WDAF.
Find the right allocation for ITA and WDAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer