IT vs. CTAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Gartner, Inc. (IT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS).

Performance

IT vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gartner, Inc. (IT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IT vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IT Gartner, Inc.	-37.24%	-47.93%	7.40%	34.20%	0.54%	108.70%	3.95%	20.54%	3.81%	21.85%
CTAS Cintas Corporation	-9.86%	3.78%	22.24%	34.82%	2.97%	26.51%	32.74%	61.73%	9.04%	36.32%

Fundamentals

Market Cap IT : $11.42B CTAS : $68.81B
EPS IT : $9.75 CTAS : $4.75
PE Ratio IT : 16.25 CTAS : 35.63
PEG Ratio IT : 2.80 CTAS : 2.50
PS Ratio IT : 1.82 CTAS : 6.26
PB Ratio IT : 35.69 CTAS : 14.37
Total Revenue (TTM) IT : $6.50B CTAS : $11.03B
Gross Profit (TTM) IT : $4.40B CTAS : $1.33B
EBITDA (TTM) IT : $1.23B CTAS : $2.66B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IT achieves a -37.24% return, which is significantly lower than CTAS's -9.86% return. Over the past 10 years, IT has underperformed CTAS with an annualized return of 5.74%, while CTAS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.61% annualized return.

IT

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: -37.24%
• 6M: -39.76%
• 1Y: -62.28%
• 3Y*: -21.38%
• 5Y*: -3.30%
• 10Y*: 5.74%

CTAS

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -15.91%
• YTD: -9.86%
• 6M: -17.21%
• 1Y: -17.00%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 15.26%
• 10Y*: 23.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

IT vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IT

IT Risk / Return Rank: 5
IT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
IT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
IT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
IT Martin Ratio Rank: 11

CTAS

CTAS Risk / Return Rank: 14
CTAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CTAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
CTAS Omega Ratio Rank: 12
CTAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CTAS Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IT vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gartner, Inc. (IT) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IT	CTAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.26	-0.80	-0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.90	-1.02	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.69	0.87	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.92	-0.60	-0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	-1.31	-0.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IT vs. CTAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IT Sharpe Ratio is -1.26, which is lower than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IT and CTAS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IT	CTAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.26	-0.80	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.68	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.89	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.52	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between IT and CTAS is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

IT vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

IT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IT Gartner, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CTAS Cintas Corporation	1.03%	0.89%	0.80%	0.83%	0.93%	0.77%	0.99%	0.95%	1.22%	1.04%	1.15%	1.15%

Drawdowns

IT vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IT drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IT and CTAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	IT	CTAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.07%	-65.32%	-19.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-67.75%	-26.72%	-41.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.73%	-26.72%	-47.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.73%	-48.38%	-25.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.30%	-25.20%	-46.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.32%	-14.99%	-15.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	42.16%	12.22%	+29.94%

Volatility

IT vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

Gartner, Inc. (IT) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Cintas Corporation (CTAS) at 7.96%. This indicates that IT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CTAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IT	CTAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	7.96%	+4.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.94%	14.35%	+22.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.72%	21.38%	+28.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.23%	22.49%	+11.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.45%	26.52%	+5.93%

Financials

IT vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gartner, Inc. and Cintas Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

IT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gartner, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.13B and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.

IT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gartner, Inc. reported an operating income of 334.20M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

IT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gartner, Inc. reported a net income of 242.10M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.