PortfoliosLab logo
CTAS vs. WM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CTAS and WM is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CTAS vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CTAS:

0.98

WM:

0.37

Sortino Ratio

CTAS:

1.40

WM:

0.57

Omega Ratio

CTAS:

1.22

WM:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

CTAS:

1.28

WM:

0.56

Martin Ratio

CTAS:

3.25

WM:

1.26

Ulcer Index

CTAS:

7.73%

WM:

5.31%

Daily Std Dev

CTAS:

25.05%

WM:

20.31%

Max Drawdown

CTAS:

-65.32%

WM:

-77.85%

Current Drawdown

CTAS:

-5.24%

WM:

-6.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTAS:

$86.95B

WM:

$89.49B

EPS

CTAS:

$4.32

WM:

$6.63

PE Ratio

CTAS:

49.84

WM:

33.54

PEG Ratio

CTAS:

3.83

WM:

2.90

PS Ratio

CTAS:

8.57

WM:

3.90

PB Ratio

CTAS:

18.88

WM:

10.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTAS:

$10.14B

WM:

$22.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTAS:

$5.02B

WM:

$8.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

CTAS:

$2.84B

WM:

$6.60B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTAS achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CTAS has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 27.30%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 18.50% annualized return.


CTAS

YTD

17.46%

1M

2.18%

6M

-3.86%

1Y

25.30%

5Y*

31.75%

10Y*

27.30%

WM

YTD

10.66%

1M

-4.23%

6M

-0.72%

1Y

7.54%

5Y*

20.37%

10Y*

18.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTAS vs. WM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTAS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTAS is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTAS is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTAS is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTAS is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WM is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WM is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WM is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WM is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WM is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WM is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CTAS vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cintas Corporation (CTAS) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CTAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTAS and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CTAS vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

CTAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than WM's 1.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
0.73%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.79%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%2.17%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.38%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%2.92%

Drawdowns

CTAS vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTAS drawdown since its inception was -65.32%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTAS and WM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CTAS vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Cintas Corporation (CTAS) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 4.78%. This indicates that CTAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CTAS vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cintas Corporation and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
2.61B
6.02B
(CTAS) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CTAS vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cintas Corporation and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
50.6%
39.4%
(CTAS) Gross Margin
(WM) Gross Margin
CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.32B and revenue of 2.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.37B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 609.85M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.4%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.01B and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 463.50M and revenue of 2.61B, resulting in a net margin of 17.8%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 637.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.