ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L
ISXF.L (iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF) and IBCX.L (iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - ISXF.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR while IBCX.L tracks the Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISXF.L returned 1.39%/yr vs 1.71%/yr for IBCX.L. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.
Performance
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISXF.L is traded in GBP, while IBCX.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IBCX.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISXF.L achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than IBCX.L's -0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ISXF.L has underperformed IBCX.L with an annualized return of 1.39%, while IBCX.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.71% annualized return.
ISXF.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.20%
- 5Y*
- -1.41%
- 10Y*
- 1.39%
IBCX.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- -0.25%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.71%
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISXF.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF | -0.58% | 6.93% | -0.18% | 8.72% | -19.96% | -4.01% | 8.54% | 11.27% | -2.05% | 3.40% |
IBCX.L iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF | -0.25% | 8.66% | -1.22% | 5.19% | -9.50% | -7.33% | 8.64% | 0.03% | -0.30% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISXF.L and IBCX.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009 | 0.33 |
The correlation between ISXF.L and IBCX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISXF.L
IBCX.L
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) and iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISXF.L | IBCX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | 1.21 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 3.16 | -0.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISXF.L | IBCX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.93 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.18 | -0.02 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.22 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.41 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISXF.L drawdown since its inception was -32.38%, which is greater than IBCX.L's maximum drawdown of -22.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISXF.L and IBCX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISXF.L | IBCX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.38% | -22.27% | -10.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.73% | -3.77% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.73% | -4.03% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.23% | -17.46% | -13.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.38% | -22.27% | -10.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.65% | -7.87% | -3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -6.89% | +0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.45% | +0.22% |
Volatility
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF (ISXF.L) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF (IBCX.L) at 1.52%. This indicates that ISXF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISXF.L | IBCX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 1.52% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.10% | 3.74% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.77% | 4.92% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.92% | 6.47% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.28% | 7.83% | -0.55% |
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISXF.L and IBCX.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISXF.L vs. IBCX.L - Dividend Comparison
ISXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, more than IBCX.L's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBCX.L iShares Euro Corporate Bond Large Cap UCITS ETF | 3.07% | 3.02% | 2.74% | 2.31% | 1.05% | 0.73% | 0.84% | 0.99% | 1.10% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.57% |
ISXF.L iShares GBP Corporate Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF | 4.54% | 4.23% | 3.97% | 3.15% | 2.93% | 2.31% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 2.87% | 2.87% | 3.48% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISXF.L and IBCX.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISXF.L and IBCX.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.
ISXF.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while IBCX.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR.
Find the right allocation for ISXF.L and IBCX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer