PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISX5.L is traded in USD, while UIFS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UIFS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISX5.L achieves a 7.24% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -2.75% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISX5.L having a 13.05% annualized return and UIFS.L not far behind at 12.93%.


ISX5.L

1D
2.46%
1M
4.58%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.56%
1Y
18.08%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
13.05%

UIFS.L

1D
1.81%
1M
4.59%
YTD
-2.75%
6M
-1.92%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
12.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISX5.L
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
7.24%37.35%4.59%26.91%-13.63%13.94%6.81%25.61%1.58%9.70%
UIFS.L
iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-2.75%15.15%30.03%11.72%-11.09%36.82%-3.73%32.15%-14.53%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ISX5.L and UIFS.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2015

0.59

The correlation between ISX5.L and UIFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.59 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISX5.L
UIFS.L

Financial Services

25.0%
98.0%

Industrials

21.7%
0.2%

Technology

17.6%
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

-

Healthcare

5.2%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Utilities

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

ISX5.L
25.0%
UIFS.L
98.0%

Industrials

ISX5.L
21.7%
UIFS.L
0.2%

Technology

ISX5.L
17.6%
UIFS.L
1.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ISX5.L
9.8%
UIFS.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ISX5.L
5.5%
UIFS.L

-

Healthcare

ISX5.L
5.2%
UIFS.L

-

Energy

ISX5.L
4.8%
UIFS.L

-

Utilities

ISX5.L
4.5%
UIFS.L

-

Basic Materials

ISX5.L
3.5%
UIFS.L

-

Communication Services

ISX5.L
2.4%
UIFS.L

-

Real Estate

ISX5.L

-

UIFS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISX5.L
ISX5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ISX5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISX5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

UIFS.L
UIFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UIFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UIFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISX5.LUIFS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.08

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

0.43

+0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.69

1.07

+3.61

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISX5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is higher than the UIFS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISX5.L and UIFS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISX5.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, smaller than the maximum UIFS.L drawdown of -47.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISX5.L and UIFS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISX5.LUIFS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.62%

-47.09%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.92%

-14.24%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-18.99%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.86%

-26.75%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.62%

-42.38%

+3.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-4.79%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-12.62%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

5.72%

-1.87%

Volatility

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) at 4.40%. This indicates that ISX5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISX5.LUIFS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

4.40%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

10.89%

+4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

14.28%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.91%

23.31%

-1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

23.10%

-1.13%

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISX5.L has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISX5.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISX5.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISX5.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISX5.L is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISX5.L is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for UIFS.L.

ISX5.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UIFS.L is Financials Equities. ISX5.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ISX5.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISX5.L and UIFS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer