ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L
ISX5.L (iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) and IMIB.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - ISX5.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while IMIB.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISX5.L returned 13.42%/yr vs 17.39%/yr for IMIB.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISX5.L charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IMIB.L.
Performance
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISX5.L is traded in USD, while IMIB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IMIB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISX5.L achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly lower than IMIB.L's 14.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ISX5.L has underperformed IMIB.L with an annualized return of 13.42%, while IMIB.L has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.
ISX5.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 7.17%
- 1Y
- 19.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.41%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
IMIB.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 33.56%
- 3Y*
- 31.28%
- 5Y*
- 19.28%
- 10Y*
- 17.39%
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISX5.L iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.98% | 37.35% | 4.59% | 26.91% | -13.63% | 13.94% | 6.81% | 25.61% | 1.58% | 9.70% |
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 14.58% | 54.63% | 11.28% | 37.43% | -13.90% | 17.23% | 4.56% | 29.86% | -17.63% | 32.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISX5.L and IMIB.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010 | 0.81 |
The correlation between ISX5.L and IMIB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Industrials
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Technology
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Consumer Defensive
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Healthcare
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Utilities
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Energy
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Basic Materials
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Communication Services
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
Real Estate
ISX5.L
-
IMIB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISX5.L
IMIB.L
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISX5.L | IMIB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 2.98 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 10.45 | -5.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISX5.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, smaller than the maximum IMIB.L drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISX5.L and IMIB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISX5.L | IMIB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.62% | -77.82% | +39.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.92% | -11.22% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -17.45% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.86% | -35.64% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.62% | -41.65% | +3.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.21% | -3.20% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.32% | -48.40% | +40.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 3.20% | +0.65% |
Volatility
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ISX5.L) and iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IMIB.L) have volatilities of 4.53% and 4.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISX5.L | IMIB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 4.72% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 14.11% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.11% | 17.08% | +1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.90% | 21.19% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.76% | 21.54% | +0.22% |
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISX5.L has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IMIB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISX5.L vs. IMIB.L - Dividend Comparison
ISX5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IMIB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMIB.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 3.75% | 3.83% | 4.53% | 3.77% | 3.90% | 3.15% | 1.44% | 3.41% | 3.25% | 2.29% | 2.82% | 2.15% |
ISX5.L iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISX5.L and IMIB.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISX5.L is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISX5.L is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IMIB.L.
ISX5.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IMIB.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for ISX5.L and 0.35% for IMIB.L.
Find the right allocation for ISX5.L and IMIB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer