ISWN vs. XIMR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) and XIMR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March) are both Options Trading funds. ISWN is passively managed, while XIMR is actively managed. Over the past year, ISWN returned 12.46% vs 7.87% for XIMR. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISWN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XIMR.

Performance

ISWN vs. XIMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISWN having a 4.03% return and XIMR slightly higher at 4.15%.

ISWN

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 4.03%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: 12.46%
• 3Y*: 8.37%
• 5Y*: -0.26%
• 10Y*: —

XIMR

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 4.15%
• 6M: 4.33%
• 1Y: 7.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWN vs. XIMR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	4.03%	23.23%	-3.98%
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March	4.15%	6.80%	5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and XIMR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.44

Return for Risk

ISWN vs. XIMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN

ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 29
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

XIMR

XIMR Risk / Return Rank: 97
XIMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
XIMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
XIMR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
XIMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
XIMR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. XIMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISWN	XIMR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	3.87	-2.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	7.00	-5.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	2.20	-1.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	7.29	-5.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	59.00	-54.81

ISWN vs. XIMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the XIMR Sharpe Ratio of 3.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and XIMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. XIMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than XIMR's maximum drawdown of -5.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and XIMR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISWN	XIMR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.35%	-5.12%	-27.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-1.08%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.26%	-0.30%	-3.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.05%	-0.17%	-15.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.98%	0.13%	+2.85%

Volatility

ISWN vs. XIMR - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) at 0.79%. This indicates that ISWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISWN	XIMR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	0.79%	+3.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	1.79%	+9.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	2.08%	+10.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.82%	4.34%	+7.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.67%	4.34%	+7.33%

ISWN vs. XIMR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than XIMR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISWN vs. XIMR - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than XIMR's 6.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	2.83%	2.89%	3.27%	2.91%	2.00%	0.76%
XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March	6.43%	6.41%	4.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISWN and XIMR in my portfolio?

ISWN and XIMR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISWN or XIMR?

ISWN has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to XIMR (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISWN dropped -32.35% vs XIMR's -5.12%.

Which ETF is better, ISWN or XIMR?

On 1-year performance, ISWN leads with 12.46% vs 7.87% for XIMR. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XIMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISWN or XIMR?

Over the 1-year period, ISWN has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 7.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISWN or XIMR?

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XIMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISWN or XIMR?

XIMR has the higher dividend yield at 6.43%, compared with 2.83% for ISWN.

What is the main difference between ISWN and XIMR?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 0.85% for XIMR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XIMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.