PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISWN vs. PBJA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISWN vs. PBJA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ISWN vs. PBJA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
0.94%23.23%-2.64%
PBJA
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January
-1.47%10.33%12.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly higher than PBJA's -1.47% return.


ISWN

1D
2.06%
1M
-6.89%
YTD
0.94%
6M
3.42%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*

PBJA

1D
1.34%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
1.02%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ISWN vs. PBJA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PBJA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ISWN vs. PBJA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PBJA
PBJA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PBJA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBJA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBJA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PBJA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBJA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. PBJA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISWNPBJADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

1.21

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.86

1.82

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.69

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.68

9.52

-2.84

ISWN vs. PBJA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the PBJA Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and PBJA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISWNPBJADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

1.21

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

1.43

-1.47

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and PBJA is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ISWN vs. PBJA - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while PBJA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.91%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%
PBJA
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. PBJA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than PBJA's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and PBJA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ISWNPBJADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.35%

-8.50%

-23.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-6.16%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-2.29%

-4.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.57%

-0.58%

-15.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.09%

+1.23%

Volatility

ISWN vs. PBJA - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - January (PBJA) at 2.50%. This indicates that ISWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBJA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ISWNPBJADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.13%

2.50%

+3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.60%

3.73%

+4.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

8.31%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

6.53%

+4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.40%

6.53%

+4.87%