ISWN vs. OCTQ
ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) and OCTQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. ISWN is passively managed, while OCTQ is actively managed. ISWN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for OCTQ.
Performance
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISWN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 13.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | -0.39% |
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% |
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISWN
OCTQ
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
Industrials
ISWN
OCTQ
Healthcare
ISWN
OCTQ
Technology
ISWN
OCTQ
Consumer Cyclical
ISWN
OCTQ
Consumer Defensive
ISWN
OCTQ
Basic Materials
ISWN
OCTQ
Communication Services
ISWN
OCTQ
Energy
ISWN
OCTQ
Utilities
ISWN
OCTQ
Real Estate
ISWN
OCTQ
Financial Services
ISWN
OCTQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISWN vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank
ISWN
OCTQ
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISWN | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISWN | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and OCTQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISWN | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.35% | 0.00% | -32.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | 0.00% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | 0.00% | -16.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISWN | OCTQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 0.00% | +12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 0.00% | +11.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 0.00% | +11.57% |
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISWN vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison
ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 2.82% | 2.89% | 3.27% | 2.91% | 2.00% | 0.76% |
OCTQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.
ISWN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 0.79% for OCTQ.
Find the right allocation for ISWN and OCTQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer