PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISWN vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ISWN

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.01%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.94%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


ISWN vs. OCTQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISWN
OCTQ

Industrials

19.8%
7.8%

Healthcare

10.6%
8.8%

Technology

10.3%
35.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
5.2%

Basic Materials

5.9%
1.6%

Communication Services

4.5%
9.9%

Energy

4.0%
3.0%

Utilities

4.0%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.0%

Financial Services

1.6%
13.4%

Industrials

ISWN
19.8%
OCTQ
7.8%

Healthcare

ISWN
10.6%
OCTQ
8.8%

Technology

ISWN
10.3%
OCTQ
35.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ISWN
7.7%
OCTQ
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

ISWN
6.7%
OCTQ
5.2%

Basic Materials

ISWN
5.9%
OCTQ
1.6%

Communication Services

ISWN
4.5%
OCTQ
9.9%

Energy

ISWN
4.0%
OCTQ
3.0%

Utilities

ISWN
4.0%
OCTQ
2.5%

Real Estate

ISWN
1.9%
OCTQ
2.0%

Financial Services

ISWN
1.6%
OCTQ
13.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISWN vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISWNOCTQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISWNOCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and OCTQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISWNOCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.35%

0.00%

-32.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

0.00%

-4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

0.00%

-16.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

Volatility

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISWNOCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

0.00%

+12.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

0.00%

+11.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.57%

0.00%

+11.57%

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISWN vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while OCTQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.82%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%
OCTQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for OCTQ.

ISWN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for OCTQ.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 0.79% for OCTQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISWN and OCTQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer