ISWN vs. HOCT
ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) and HOCT (Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October) are both Options Trading funds. ISWN is passively managed, while HOCT is actively managed. ISWN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for HOCT.
Performance
ISWN vs. HOCT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISWN
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- YTD
- 4.28%
- 6M
- 4.94%
- 1Y
- 13.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.12%
- 5Y*
- -0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
HOCT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISWN vs. HOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | -0.39% |
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISWN vs. HOCT — Risk / Return Rank
ISWN
HOCT
ISWN vs. HOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October (HOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISWN | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.67 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISWN | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | — | — |
Drawdowns
ISWN vs. HOCT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than HOCT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and HOCT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISWN | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.35% | 0.00% | -32.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | 0.00% | -4.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | 0.00% | -16.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
ISWN vs. HOCT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISWN | HOCT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 0.00% | +12.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.67% | 0.00% | +11.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 0.00% | +11.57% |
ISWN vs. HOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISWN vs. HOCT - Dividend Comparison
ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, while HOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOCT Innovator Premium Income 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | 2.82% | 2.89% | 3.27% | 2.91% | 2.00% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for HOCT.
ISWN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.00% for HOCT.
They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 0.79% for HOCT.
Find the right allocation for ISWN and HOCT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer