PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISWN vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISWN vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 5.53% return.


ISWN

1D
-0.80%
1M
2.01%
YTD
4.28%
6M
4.94%
1Y
13.27%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
-0.37%
10Y*

DIVO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.34%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.82%
1Y
18.37%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWN vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
4.28%23.23%-3.96%8.19%-24.93%0.44%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
5.53%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%20.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and DIVO is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.51

The correlation between ISWN and DIVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISWN vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISWN
DIVO

Industrials

19.8%
16.2%

Healthcare

10.6%
6.7%

Technology

10.3%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
6.9%

Basic Materials

5.9%
4.1%

Communication Services

4.5%
1.0%

Energy

4.0%
6.8%

Utilities

4.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Financial Services

1.6%
30.3%

Industrials

ISWN
19.8%
DIVO
16.2%

Healthcare

ISWN
10.6%
DIVO
6.7%

Technology

ISWN
10.3%
DIVO
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ISWN
7.7%
DIVO
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

ISWN
6.7%
DIVO
6.9%

Basic Materials

ISWN
5.9%
DIVO
4.1%

Communication Services

ISWN
4.5%
DIVO
1.0%

Energy

ISWN
4.0%
DIVO
6.8%

Utilities

ISWN
4.0%
DIVO
2.0%

Real Estate

ISWN
1.9%
DIVO

-

Financial Services

ISWN
1.6%
DIVO
30.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISWN vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN
ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISWNDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.10

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

11.21

-6.54

ISWN vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISWNDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

2.06

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.89

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.85

-0.84

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISWNDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.35%

-30.04%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.63%

-5.95%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.77%

-12.12%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.35%

-13.72%

-18.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-0.82%

-3.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-2.61%

-13.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

1.64%

+1.21%

Volatility

ISWN vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.01%. This indicates that ISWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISWNDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

2.01%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.10%

6.88%

+3.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

8.97%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.67%

11.94%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.57%

14.84%

-3.27%

ISWN vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISWN vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than DIVO's 6.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.42%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%
ISWN
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
2.82%2.89%3.27%2.91%2.00%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISWN and DIVO have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISWN has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to DIVO (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISWN dropped -32.35% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.61% vs -0.37% for ISWN. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs -0.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.42%, compared with 2.82% for ISWN.

ISWN is categorized as Options Trading, while DIVO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISWN and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer