ISWN vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISWN is a Options Trading fund tracking the S-Network International BlackSwan, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. ISWN is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, ISWN returned 14.94% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. ISWN charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

ISWN vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 5.44% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.86% return.

ISWN

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.65%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 6M: 5.63%
• 1Y: 14.94%
• 3Y*: 8.86%
• 5Y*: 0.14%
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWN vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	5.44%	23.23%	-7.21%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.86%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and CSHP is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	-0.07

The correlation between ISWN and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ISWN vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN

ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 34
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISWN	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	11.22	-10.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	28.31	-26.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	6.67	-5.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.56	65.84	-64.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.05	395.75	-390.71

ISWN vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISWN	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.35%	-0.08%	-32.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-0.06%	-9.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.97%	-0.01%	-2.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.06%	-0.00%	-16.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	0.01%	+2.96%

Volatility

ISWN vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.15%. This indicates that ISWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISWN	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	0.15%	+4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.78%	0.27%	+10.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.71%	0.36%	+12.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.81%	0.41%	+11.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.66%	0.41%	+11.25%

ISWN vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISWN vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	2.79%	2.89%	3.27%	2.91%	2.00%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISWN and CSHP in my portfolio?

ISWN and CSHP have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISWN or CSHP?

ISWN has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to CSHP (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISWN dropped -32.35% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, ISWN or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, ISWN leads with 14.94% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISWN or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, ISWN has performed better with a 14.94% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISWN or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ISWN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISWN or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 2.79% for ISWN.

What is the main difference between ISWN and CSHP?

ISWN is categorized as Options Trading, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.