ISWN vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

ISWN (Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISWN is a Options Trading fund tracking the S-Network International BlackSwan, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISWN returned 7.64%/yr vs -30.65%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. ISWN charges 0.49%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

ISWN vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWN achieves a 3.76% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 28.75% return.

ISWN

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: -0.89%
• 6M: 1.48%
• YTD: 3.76%
• 1Y: 11.48%
• 3Y*: 7.64%
• 5Y*: -0.49%
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 34.68%
• YTD: 28.75%
• 1Y: 68.34%
• 3Y*: -30.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWN vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	3.76%	23.23%	-3.96%	8.19%	-3.76%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	28.75%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWN and BITI is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.23

The correlation between ISWN and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to -0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ISWN vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISWN

ISWN Risk / Return Rank: 30
ISWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ISWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Omega Ratio Rank: 29
ISWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
ISWN Martin Ratio Rank: 32

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 57
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWN vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISWN	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.56	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.13	-0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.26	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	2.72	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.77	6.78	-3.01

ISWN vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWN Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWN and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISWN vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWN drawdown since its inception was -32.35%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWN and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISWN	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.35%	-92.16%	+59.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.63%	-25.28%	+15.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.77%	-84.63%	+70.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.51%	-85.94%	+81.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.93%	-68.34%	+52.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.05%	10.11%	-7.06%

Volatility

ISWN vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF (ISWN) is 4.55%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 11.38%. This indicates that ISWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISWN	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.55%	11.38%	-6.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.11%	34.25%	-23.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.85%	44.14%	-31.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.86%	52.28%	-40.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.67%	52.28%	-40.61%

ISWN vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISWN vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

ISWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than BITI's 15.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.10%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%	0.00%
ISWN Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF	2.90%	2.89%	3.27%	2.91%	2.00%	0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISWN and BITI in my portfolio?

ISWN and BITI have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISWN or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (11.38%) compared to ISWN (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISWN dropped -32.35% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, ISWN or BITI?

On 3-year performance, ISWN leads with 7.64% vs -30.65% for BITI. On fees, ISWN is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, ISWN has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISWN or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, ISWN has performed better with a 7.64% return vs -30.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISWN or BITI?

ISWN is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISWN or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.10%, compared with 2.90% for ISWN.

What is the main difference between ISWN and BITI?

ISWN is categorized as Options Trading, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ISWN tracks S-Network International BlackSwan, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ISWN and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.