PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISWD.L vs. INFR.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISWD.L (iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and INFR.L (iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Islamic Index, while INFR.L is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISWD.L returned 12.78%/yr vs 8.92%/yr for INFR.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISWD.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for INFR.L.

Performance

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISWD.L achieves a 20.37% return, which is significantly higher than INFR.L's 10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ISWD.L has outperformed INFR.L with an annualized return of 12.78%, while INFR.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.

ISWD.L

1D
0.65%
1M
11.25%
YTD
20.37%
6M
20.71%
1Y
38.83%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
12.78%

INFR.L

1D
1.36%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.08%
1Y
17.53%
3Y*
10.01%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		20.37%11.58%7.85%17.25%-0.87%23.70%5.11%17.98%-3.81%9.22%
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		10.90%5.90%11.49%-4.96%5.77%19.54%-4.70%20.82%4.39%5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ISWD.L and INFR.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2008

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between ISWD.L and INFR.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ISWD.L
INFR.L

Technology

42.8%
0.7%

Industrials

12.9%
20.8%

Energy

11.6%
16.4%

Healthcare

10.4%

-

Basic Materials

9.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%

-

Utilities

1.1%
56.0%

Communication Services

0.4%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
5.0%

Financial Services

0.0%
0.0%

Technology

ISWD.L
42.8%
INFR.L
0.7%

Industrials

ISWD.L
12.9%
INFR.L
20.8%

Energy

ISWD.L
11.6%
INFR.L
16.4%

Healthcare

ISWD.L
10.4%
INFR.L

-

Basic Materials

ISWD.L
9.6%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISWD.L
6.9%
INFR.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ISWD.L
3.7%
INFR.L

-

Utilities

ISWD.L
1.1%
INFR.L
56.0%

Communication Services

ISWD.L
0.4%
INFR.L
1.0%

Real Estate

ISWD.L
0.2%
INFR.L
5.0%

Financial Services

ISWD.L
0.0%
INFR.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Often compared with ISWD.L:
ISWD.L vs. IGDA.LISWD.L vs. SPUSISWD.L vs. HLALISWD.L vs. VOOISWD.L vs. SPWOISWD.L vs. UMMAISWD.L vs. HIWS.L
Often compared with INFR.L:
INFR.L vs. DPGT.LINFR.L vs. IUIT.LINFR.L vs. IWDA.LINFR.L vs. ARCK.LINFR.L vs. FWRG.LINFR.L vs. IDWR.LINFR.L vs. WUTI.L

Return for Risk

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISWD.L
ISWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
INFR.L
INFR.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
INFR.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INFR.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
INFR.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
INFR.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
INFR.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ISWD.LINFR.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.42
1.68

+1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.60
2.37

+2.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.29

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.02

3.37

+3.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.08

8.61

+15.46

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISWD.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is higher than the INFR.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISWD.L and INFR.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ISWD.LINFR.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

1.68

+1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.64

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.63

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.52

+0.22

Drawdowns

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISWD.L drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum INFR.L drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISWD.L and INFR.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISWD.LINFR.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.52%

-34.25%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.51%

-5.19%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-11.08%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.00%

-22.87%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.90%

-26.75%

+1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.49%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-6.12%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

2.03%

-0.42%

Volatility

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ISWD.L) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (INFR.L) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISWD.LINFR.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

3.73%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

8.85%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

10.42%

+0.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.27%

12.25%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

14.09%

+0.24%

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISWD.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISWD.L vs. INFR.L - Dividend Comparison

ISWD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than INFR.L's 2.78% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INFR.L
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.78%2.97%2.96%3.02%2.54%2.60%2.84%2.70%2.99%3.51%3.45%4.75%
ISWD.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		1.27%1.50%1.74%1.99%2.43%1.98%1.88%2.37%2.39%2.09%2.09%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISWD.L and INFR.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISWD.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISWD.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for INFR.L.

ISWD.L is categorized as Global Equities, while INFR.L is Utilities Equities. ISWD.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index, while INFR.L tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ISWD.L and 0.65% for INFR.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISWD.L and INFR.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer