PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISTB vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISTB vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISTB achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -29.06% return.


ISTB

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.10%
6M
0.45%
YTD
0.49%
1Y
3.42%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
2.21%

IBIT

1D
-2.79%
1M
-2.28%
6M
-32.10%
YTD
-29.06%
1Y
-47.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISTB vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.49%6.36%4.64%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-29.06%-6.41%89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ISTB and IBIT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISTB vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISTB vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISTBIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.82

+0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

-0.90

+3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

-1.46

+11.47

ISTB vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISTB and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISTB vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISTB drawdown since its inception was -9.34%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISTB and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISTBIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-53.30%

+43.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-53.30%

+52.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-50.60%

+50.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.21%

-17.56%

+16.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

32.72%

-32.38%

Volatility

ISTB vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) is 0.61%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that ISTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISTBIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

11.51%

-10.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

34.79%

-33.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80%

44.38%

-42.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.80%

49.97%

-47.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

49.97%

-47.46%

ISTB vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISTB vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

ISTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.27%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISTB and IBIT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to ISTB (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISTB dropped -9.34% vs IBIT's -53.30%.

On 1-year performance, ISTB leads with 3.42% vs -47.60% for IBIT. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISTB has performed better with a 3.42% return vs -47.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

ISTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.27%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

ISTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD), while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISTB and 0.25% for IBIT.

ISTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISTB and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer