PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISTB vs. ACWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISTB vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISTB achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ISTB has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 2.27%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.85% annualized return.


ISTB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.71%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
2.27%

ACWI

1D
-0.83%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.13%
6M
12.96%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISTB vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.49%6.36%4.37%5.56%-6.08%-0.71%4.75%5.61%1.02%1.72%
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
12.13%22.41%17.45%22.27%-18.39%18.66%16.34%26.59%-9.19%24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between ISTB and ACWI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.08

Over the past year, ISTB and ACWI have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ISTB vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISTB
ACWI

Utilities

99.4%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Communication Services

-

9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.0%

Energy

-

4.2%

Financial Services

-

16.1%

Healthcare

-

8.1%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Technology

-

29.4%

Utilities

ISTB
99.4%
ACWI
2.6%

Real Estate

ISTB
0.6%
ACWI
1.8%

Basic Materials

ISTB

-

ACWI
3.7%

Communication Services

ISTB

-

ACWI
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ISTB

-

ACWI
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

ISTB

-

ACWI
5.0%

Energy

ISTB

-

ACWI
4.2%

Financial Services

ISTB

-

ACWI
16.1%

Healthcare

ISTB

-

ACWI
8.1%

Industrials

ISTB

-

ACWI
10.9%

Technology

ISTB

-

ACWI
29.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISTB vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI
ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISTB vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISTBACWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.41

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.01

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

13.53

-0.81

ISTB vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISTB and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISTBACWIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.29

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.71

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.75

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.43

+0.41

Drawdowns

ISTB vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISTB drawdown since its inception was -9.34%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISTB and ACWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISTBACWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-56.00%

+46.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-9.73%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.36%

-16.55%

+15.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.34%

-26.42%

+17.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.34%

-33.53%

+24.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.83%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-8.61%

+7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

2.16%

-1.83%

Volatility

ISTB vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) is 0.54%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that ISTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISTBACWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

3.93%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

10.29%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77%

12.78%

-11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

16.05%

-13.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

17.11%

-14.60%

ISTB vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISTB vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

ISTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF
1.38%1.55%1.70%1.88%1.79%1.71%1.43%2.33%2.18%1.94%2.19%2.56%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.25%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISTB and ACWI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to ISTB (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISTB dropped -9.34% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.85% vs 2.27% for ISTB. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.85% return vs 2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

ISTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.

ISTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while ACWI is Global Equities. ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD), while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISTB and 0.32% for ACWI.

ISTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISTB and ACWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer