ISSB vs. LQTI
ISSB (IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISSB charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
ISSB vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISSB
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -21.59%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISSB vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISSB IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF | -21.95% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISSB and LQTI is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISSB vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
ISSB
LQTI
ISSB vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF (ISSB) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISSB | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.84 | 0.94 | -1.79 |
Drawdowns
ISSB vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISSB drawdown since its inception was -29.67%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISSB and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISSB | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.67% | -3.41% | -26.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.73% | -0.97% | -23.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.02% | -0.88% | -15.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
ISSB vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISSB | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.47% | 5.12% | +53.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.47% | 5.97% | +52.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.47% | 5.97% | +52.50% |
ISSB vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISSB has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISSB vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
ISSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, less than LQTI's 9.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISSB IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF | 7.96% | 0.00% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.07% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISSB and LQTI have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISSB.
LQTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.07%, compared with 7.96% for ISSB.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISSB and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for ISSB and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer