ISSB vs. OMAH
ISSB (IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISSB charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.
Performance
ISSB vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISSB
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -21.59%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 12.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISSB vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISSB IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF | -21.95% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISSB and OMAH is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISSB vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank
ISSB
OMAH
ISSB vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF (ISSB) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISSB | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.84 | 0.74 | -1.58 |
Drawdowns
ISSB vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISSB drawdown since its inception was -29.67%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISSB and OMAH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISSB | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.67% | -11.83% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.73% | -2.12% | -22.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.02% | -1.26% | -14.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility
ISSB vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISSB | OMAH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.47% | 8.06% | +50.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.47% | 13.20% | +45.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.47% | 13.20% | +45.27% |
ISSB vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISSB has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISSB vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison
ISSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, less than OMAH's 15.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ISSB IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF | 7.96% | 0.00% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.36% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISSB and OMAH have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OMAH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OMAH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISSB.
OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.36%, compared with 7.96% for ISSB.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISSB and 0.95% for OMAH.
Find the right allocation for ISSB and OMAH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer