PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (ISPE.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISPE.L is traded in GBP, while SPYL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYL.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISPE.L achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than SPYL.L's 9.18% return.


ISPE.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.94%
6M
8.09%
YTD
11.64%
1Y
17.98%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
10Y*

SPYL.L

1D
-1.07%
1M
-1.76%
6M
7.38%
YTD
9.18%
1Y
19.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ISPE.L
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
11.64%11.30%11.48%18.16%
SPYL.L
SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc
9.18%9.02%27.54%9.16%

Correlation

The correlation between ISPE.L and SPYL.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023

0.58

The correlation between ISPE.L and SPYL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISPE.L
ISPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ISPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.L
SPYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (ISPE.L) and SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISPE.LSPYL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.29

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.70

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.22

8.97

+0.25

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the SPYL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISPE.L and SPYL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISPE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum SPYL.L drawdown of -22.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPE.L and SPYL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISPE.LSPYL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-22.01%

+3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-7.25%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.87%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-2.87%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.19%

-0.24%

Volatility

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (ISPE.L) is 2.67%, while SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Acc (SPYL.L) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that ISPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISPE.LSPYL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

3.12%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

9.26%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

12.20%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

25.13%

-10.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

25.13%

-10.50%

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISPE.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.L's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISPE.L vs. SPYL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISPE.L nor SPYL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISPE.L and SPYL.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.L is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.L is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ISPE.L.

ISPE.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index (USD), while SPYL.L tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ISPE.L and 0.03% for SPYL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISPE.L and SPYL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer