PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISPE.L vs. SMH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ISPE.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISPE.L is traded in GBP, while SMH.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SMH.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISPE.L achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than SMH.L's 75.78% return.


ISPE.L

1D
-0.48%
1M
-0.08%
6M
7.91%
YTD
10.81%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
10Y*

SMH.L

1D
-4.48%
1M
-9.67%
6M
61.91%
YTD
75.78%
1Y
121.85%
3Y*
52.56%
5Y*
36.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ISPE.L
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF
10.81%11.30%11.48%12.23%-3.77%
SMH.L
VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF
75.78%38.57%26.28%67.15%-13.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ISPE.L and SMH.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022

0.49

The correlation between ISPE.L and SMH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISPE.L
ISPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ISPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH.L
SMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ISPE.L) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISPE.LSMH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

8.50

-5.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

28.48

-18.75

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISPE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is lower than the SMH.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISPE.L and SMH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISPE.L drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum SMH.L drawdown of -36.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPE.L and SMH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISPE.LSMH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-36.36%

+18.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-14.25%

+7.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.22%

-36.36%

+18.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-13.65%

+12.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

-9.75%

+6.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

4.26%

-2.31%

Volatility

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF (ISPE.L) is 2.86%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (SMH.L) has a volatility of 16.49%. This indicates that ISPE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISPE.LSMH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

16.49%

-13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.96%

30.17%

-22.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

36.45%

-25.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.63%

32.35%

-17.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

31.76%

-17.13%

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISPE.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SMH.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISPE.L vs. SMH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISPE.L nor SMH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ISPE.L and SMH.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISPE.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISPE.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMH.L.

ISPE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SMH.L is Semiconductors. ISPE.L tracks iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF, while SMH.L tracks MarketVector US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped Screened Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ISPE.L and 0.35% for SMH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISPE.L and SMH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer