ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA
ISP6.L (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF) and CSH.PA (Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - ISP6.L is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 TR USD, while CSH.PA is a Money Market fund tracking the Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISP6.L returned 9.92%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for CSH.PA. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISP6.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CSH.PA.
Performance
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISP6.L is traded in GBp, while CSH.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSH.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISP6.L achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly higher than CSH.PA's -1.57% return. Over the past 10 years, ISP6.L has outperformed CSH.PA with an annualized return of 9.92%, while CSH.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 0.77% annualized return.
ISP6.L
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 30.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
CSH.PA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 1Y
- -0.02%
- 3Y*
- 2.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 0.77%
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISP6.L iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF | 19.53% | -0.91% | 8.76% | 10.98% | -6.72% | 27.86% | 6.87% | 17.51% | -4.56% | 3.05% |
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | -1.57% | 7.72% | -1.02% | 1.16% | 5.05% | -6.59% | 4.93% | -6.25% | 0.43% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISP6.L and CSH.PA is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2008 | 0.08 |
The correlation between ISP6.L and CSH.PA shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (3 years) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA — Risk / Return Rank
ISP6.L
CSH.PA
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISP6.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.01 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.57 | 0.08 | +4.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 0.21 | +13.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISP6.L drawdown since its inception was -66.35%, which is greater than CSH.PA's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISP6.L and CSH.PA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISP6.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.35% | -27.56% | -38.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.45% | -2.88% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -3.28% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.26% | -4.92% | -25.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.08% | -13.54% | -25.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -5.45% | +2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.49% | -11.20% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 1.08% | +1.09% |
Volatility
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc (CSH.PA) at 1.13%. This indicates that ISP6.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSH.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISP6.L | CSH.PA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.43% | 1.13% | +3.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 2.69% | +8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 3.92% | +11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 5.34% | +13.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 6.58% | +13.80% |
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISP6.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH.PA's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISP6.L vs. CSH.PA - Dividend Comparison
ISP6.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while CSH.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSH.PA Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISP6.L iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF | 0.53% | 1.22% | 1.15% | 1.08% | 1.00% | 0.65% | 0.94% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 0.78% | 0.77% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISP6.L and CSH.PA have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSH.PA is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSH.PA is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISP6.L.
ISP6.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CSH.PA is Money Market. ISP6.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while CSH.PA tracks Solactive Euro Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISP6.L and 0.10% for CSH.PA.
Find the right allocation for ISP6.L and CSH.PA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer