PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (ISP.MI) and Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISP.MI is traded in EUR, while PCFT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PCFT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISP.MI achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than PCFT.L's 3.29% return. Over the past 10 years, ISP.MI has outperformed PCFT.L with an annualized return of 19.60%, while PCFT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.02% annualized return.


ISP.MI

1D
4.29%
1M
5.78%
YTD
2.03%
6M
6.52%
1Y
28.53%
3Y*
47.73%
5Y*
29.87%
10Y*
19.60%

PCFT.L

1D
1.90%
1M
5.07%
YTD
3.29%
6M
7.90%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
12.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISP.MI
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
2.03%64.26%59.30%39.32%-1.29%29.43%-18.72%33.23%-24.88%21.73%
PCFT.L
Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc
3.29%18.18%38.12%2.95%-13.92%33.54%-4.63%30.85%-14.08%11.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ISP.MI and PCFT.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.34

The correlation between ISP.MI and PCFT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISP.MI
ISP.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISP.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISP.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PCFT.L
PCFT.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCFT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCFT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (ISP.MI) and Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISP.MIPCFT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.19

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.79

3.50

+1.29

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISP.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the PCFT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISP.MI and PCFT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISP.MI drawdown since its inception was -81.29%, which is greater than PCFT.L's maximum drawdown of -46.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISP.MI and PCFT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISP.MIPCFT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.29%

-46.09%

-35.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.92%

-12.23%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.21%

-17.80%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.57%

-29.41%

-13.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

-46.09%

-5.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.47%

-0.58%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-9.43%

-23.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

4.17%

+1.78%

Volatility

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Volatility Comparison

Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (ISP.MI) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc (PCFT.L) at 3.05%. This indicates that ISP.MI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCFT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISP.MIPCFT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.39%

3.05%

+4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.92%

12.84%

+6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.81%

16.17%

+8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.55%

18.37%

+9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.14%

21.24%

+8.90%

Dividends

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Dividend Comparison

ISP.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than PCFT.L's 3.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISP.MI
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
6.44%6.03%8.34%8.87%7.34%9.14%0.00%8.38%10.46%6.43%5.76%2.27%
PCFT.L
Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc
3.93%2.76%2.40%3.01%2.88%2.54%3.10%2.95%3.31%2.55%2.71%3.90%

Financials

ISP.MI vs. PCFT.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intesa Sanpaolo SpA and Polar Capital Global Financials Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ISP.MI values in EUR, PCFT.L values in GBP

Frequently Asked Questions


ISP.MI and PCFT.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISP.MI and PCFT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer