ISNQX vs. IMCDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISNQX (Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio) and IMCDX (Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund) are both mutual funds - ISNQX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Voya, while IMCDX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Voya. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISNQX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IMCDX.

Performance

ISNQX vs. IMCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ISNQX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 19.31%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

IMCDX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISNQX vs. IMCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	11.58%	20.04%	15.16%	20.86%	-19.16%	17.44%	16.39%	24.65%	-10.36%	22.00%
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.44%	8.51%	-13.79%	0.08%	8.35%	13.65%	-1.77%	9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ISNQX and IMCDX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2012	0.22

Return for Risk

ISNQX vs. IMCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISNQX

ISNQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
ISNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ISNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ISNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ISNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ISNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISNQX vs. IMCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund (IMCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISNQX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.25	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISNQX	IMCDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ISNQX	IMCDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.79%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ISNQX	IMCDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.78%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.00%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.31%	—	—

ISNQX vs. IMCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISNQX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCDX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ISNQX vs. IMCDX - Dividend Comparison

ISNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, while IMCDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IMCDX Voya Emerging Markets Corporate Debt Fund	0.00%	0.00%	4.08%	4.21%	3.80%	6.14%	4.64%	4.99%	5.30%	4.79%	5.22%	5.11%
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	7.18%	8.01%	1.33%	6.04%	31.37%	2.78%	6.32%	8.18%	6.96%	1.98%	1.14%	7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISNQX and IMCDX in my portfolio?

ISNQX and IMCDX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.