PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISMF vs. UUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISMF vs. UUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMF achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return.


ISMF

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.30%
6M
2.17%
YTD
6.60%
1Y
20.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UUP

1D
0.39%
1M
1.97%
6M
4.47%
YTD
5.44%
1Y
8.28%
3Y*
5.86%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
3.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISMF vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISMF and UUP is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

-0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISMF vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMF
ISMF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ISMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

UUP
UUP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
UUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UUP Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
UUP Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMF vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISMFUUPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.25

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.25

2.28

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.54

6.26

+10.28

ISMF vs. UUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the UUP Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMF and UUP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISMF vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMF drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum UUP drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMF and UUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISMFUUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-22.19%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

-3.65%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.63%

-1.26%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-8.88%

+7.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.33%

-0.08%

Volatility

ISMF vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) has a higher volatility of 1.60% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that ISMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISMFUUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.60%

1.45%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

4.34%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.99%

6.03%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.67%

7.22%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.67%

6.90%

+0.77%

ISMF vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISMF vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison

ISMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, more than UUP's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISMF
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
5.85%6.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UUP
Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund
3.25%3.43%4.48%6.44%0.89%0.00%0.00%2.03%1.08%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISMF and UUP have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISMF has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMF dropped -4.23% vs UUP's -22.19%.

On 1-year performance, ISMF leads with 20.58% vs 8.28% for UUP. On fees, UUP is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISMF has performed better with a 20.58% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UUP is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ISMF.

ISMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.85%, compared with 3.25% for UUP.

ISMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while UUP is Currency. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ISMF and 0.75% for UUP.

ISMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISMF and UUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer