ISMF vs. ENDW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISMF (iShares Managed Futures Active ETF) and ENDW (Cambria Endowment Style ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISMF is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iShares, while ENDW is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ISMF returned 22.64% vs 27.79% for ENDW. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISMF charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for ENDW.

Performance

ISMF vs. ENDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMF achieves a 8.37% return, which is significantly lower than ENDW's 10.76% return.

ISMF

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 8.37%
• 6M: 11.16%
• 1Y: 22.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENDW

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 10.76%
• 6M: 11.08%
• 1Y: 27.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISMF vs. ENDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ISMF iShares Managed Futures Active ETF	8.37%	13.97%
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	10.76%	30.77%

Correlation

The correlation between ISMF and ENDW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

ISMF vs. ENDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISMF

ISMF Risk / Return Rank: 89
ISMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ISMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ISMF Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ISMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ISMF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

ENDW

ENDW Risk / Return Rank: 83
ENDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ENDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ENDW Omega Ratio Rank: 82
ENDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ENDW Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISMF vs. ENDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISMF	ENDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	2.76	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.91	3.75	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.50	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.77	4.34	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.96	17.69	+2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISMF vs. ENDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the ENDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMF and ENDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISMF	ENDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	2.76	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.17	3.50	-1.33

Drawdowns

ISMF vs. ENDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMF drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum ENDW drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMF and ENDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISMF	ENDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-6.44%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.94%	-6.44%	+2.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.63%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-0.81%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.14%	1.57%	-0.43%

Volatility

ISMF vs. ENDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) is 1.89%, while Cambria Endowment Style ETF (ENDW) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that ISMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISMF	ENDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.89%	2.78%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.33%	7.62%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.92%	10.13%	-2.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.78%	11.00%	-3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.78%	11.00%	-3.22%

ISMF vs. ENDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ENDW's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISMF vs. ENDW - Dividend Comparison

ISMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than ENDW's 2.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ENDW Cambria Endowment Style ETF	2.18%	1.91%
ISMF iShares Managed Futures Active ETF	5.75%	6.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISMF and ENDW in my portfolio?

ISMF and ENDW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISMF or ENDW?

ENDW has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to ISMF (1.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMF dropped -4.23% vs ENDW's -6.44%.

Which ETF is better, ISMF or ENDW?

On 1-year performance, ENDW leads with 27.79% vs 22.64% for ISMF. On fees, ENDW is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, ISMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISMF or ENDW?

Over the 1-year period, ENDW has performed better with a 27.79% return vs 22.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISMF or ENDW?

ENDW is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ISMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISMF or ENDW?

ISMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 2.18% for ENDW.

What is the main difference between ISMF and ENDW?

ISMF is categorized as Systematic Trend, while ENDW is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ISMF and 0.29% for ENDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.