ISMD vs. SCDS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ISMD (Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. ISMD is passively managed, while SCDS is actively managed. Over the past year, ISMD returned 41.09% vs 40.88% for SCDS. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ISMD charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.

Performance

ISMD vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMD achieves a 27.66% return, which is significantly higher than SCDS's 25.21% return.

ISMD

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.59%
• 6M: 18.90%
• YTD: 27.66%
• 1Y: 41.09%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.85%

SCDS

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: -0.91%
• 6M: 17.80%
• YTD: 25.21%
• 1Y: 40.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	$2.42M	$2.34M	$1.91M
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	$154.38K	$83.77K	$106.90K

ISMD vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	27.66%	4.14%	8.19%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	25.21%	11.27%	7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ISMD and SCDS is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024	0.91

The correlation between ISMD and SCDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISMD vs. SCDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISMD	SCDS
Financial Services	17.1%	17.7%
Industrials	15.8%	12.8%
Technology	14.1%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	10.5%
Healthcare	9.7%	17.5%
Real Estate	8.5%	6.1%
Basic Materials	6.8%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	2.9%
Energy	4.5%	4.4%
Utilities	3.6%	2.8%
Communication Services	1.5%	2.1%

Return for Risk

ISMD vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISMD

ISMD Risk / Return Rank: 88
ISMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ISMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ISMD Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ISMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ISMD Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 89
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISMD vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISMD	SCDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.14	2.12	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.05	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.36	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	4.39	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	15.32	-2.27

ISMD vs. SCDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the SCDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMD and SCDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISMD vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMD drawdown since its inception was -44.60%, which is greater than SCDS's maximum drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMD and SCDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISMD	SCDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.60%	-26.71%	-17.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-8.85%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.21%	-2.37%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.05%	-4.96%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	2.53%	+0.44%

Volatility

ISMD vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison

Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF (ISMD) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) have volatilities of 3.68% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISMD	SCDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.68%	3.72%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.55%	13.46%	-0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.22%	18.40%	-0.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	20.86%	-0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.62%	20.86%	+2.76%

ISMD vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMD has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISMD vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison

ISMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than SCDS's 0.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISMD Inspire Small/Mid Cap Impact ETF	1.12%	1.21%	1.24%	1.17%	1.28%	9.35%	0.99%	0.88%	1.35%	2.02%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.92%	1.15%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISMD and SCDS in my portfolio?

ISMD and SCDS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISMD or SCDS?

SCDS has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to ISMD (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMD dropped -44.60% vs SCDS's -26.71%.

Which ETF is better, ISMD or SCDS?

On 1-year performance, ISMD leads with 41.09% vs 40.88% for SCDS. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISMD or SCDS?

Over the 1-year period, ISMD has performed better with a 41.09% return vs 40.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISMD or SCDS?

SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for ISMD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISMD or SCDS?

ISMD has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.92% for SCDS.

What is the main difference between ISMD and SCDS?

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for ISMD and 0.40% for SCDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.