PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price, while EQQQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISLN.L returned 15.84%/yr vs 21.58%/yr for EQQQ.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISLN.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.

Performance

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISLN.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISLN.L achieves a 2.87% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.56% return. Over the past 10 years, ISLN.L has underperformed EQQQ.L with an annualized return of 15.84%, while EQQQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.58% annualized return.

ISLN.L

1D
0.43%
1M
0.11%
YTD
2.87%
6M
29.09%
1Y
113.78%
3Y*
45.97%
5Y*
21.30%
10Y*
15.84%

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.56%
6M
19.25%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
21.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC		2.87%147.59%21.12%-0.77%3.39%-12.85%45.85%16.35%-8.76%3.68%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		19.56%19.96%26.41%55.59%-33.50%28.41%47.71%39.05%-1.28%31.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ISLN.L and EQQQ.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2011

0.13

The correlation between ISLN.L and EQQQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ISLN.L
EQQQ.L

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.0%

Industrials

6.0%
2.8%

Healthcare

5.9%
3.7%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.0%

Energy

2.9%
0.5%

Technology

2.8%
57.9%

Financial Services

2.5%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

2.3%
11.6%

Utilities

2.0%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
6.6%

Communication Services

0.4%
14.5%

Basic Materials

ISLN.L
6.6%
EQQQ.L
1.0%

Industrials

ISLN.L
6.0%
EQQQ.L
2.8%

Healthcare

ISLN.L
5.9%
EQQQ.L
3.7%

Real Estate

ISLN.L
3.5%
EQQQ.L
0.0%

Energy

ISLN.L
2.9%
EQQQ.L
0.5%

Technology

ISLN.L
2.8%
EQQQ.L
57.9%

Financial Services

ISLN.L
2.5%
EQQQ.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ISLN.L
2.3%
EQQQ.L
11.6%

Utilities

ISLN.L
2.0%
EQQQ.L
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

ISLN.L
0.4%
EQQQ.L
6.6%

Communication Services

ISLN.L
0.4%
EQQQ.L
14.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Physical Silver ETC

Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF

Often compared with ISLN.L:
ISLN.L vs. SSLN.LISLN.L vs. SLVISLN.L vs. EGLN.LISLN.L vs. IGLN.LISLN.L vs. XAGUSD=XISLN.L vs. SLVR.LISLN.L vs. SVR-C.TO
Often compared with EQQQ.L:
EQQQ.L vs. QQQEQQQ.L vs. QQQMEQQQ.L vs. EQGB.LEQQQ.L vs. CNX1.LEQQQ.L vs. EQQU.LEQQQ.L vs. CSPX.LEQQQ.L vs. XNAQ.L

Return for Risk

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISLN.L
ISLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ISLN.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.99
2.61

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.33
3.59

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.44

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.64

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

13.38

-7.30

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISLN.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ISLN.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.61

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.86

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

1.08

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.81

-0.69

Drawdowns

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISLN.L drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISLN.L and EQQQ.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISLN.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.63%

-50.98%

-25.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.67%

-11.03%

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.67%

-22.63%

-18.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.67%

-35.27%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.90%

-35.27%

-7.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.25%

-0.75%

-34.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.28%

-7.06%

-47.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.63%

3.00%

+15.63%

Volatility

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a higher volatility of 17.61% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.34%. This indicates that ISLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISLN.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.61%

4.34%

+13.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.22%

11.19%

+43.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.90%

15.34%

+41.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.49%

20.50%

+14.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.92%

19.85%

+11.07%

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISLN.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

ISLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF		0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
ISLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISLN.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISLN.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISLN.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

ISLN.L is categorized as Silver, while EQQQ.L is Nasdaq-100. ISLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISLN.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISLN.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer