PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and BNB (BNB-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISLN.L achieves a -5.58% return, which is significantly higher than BNB-USD's -29.49% return.


ISLN.L

1D
5.80%
1M
-20.59%
YTD
-5.58%
6M
9.90%
1Y
86.37%
3Y*
41.38%
5Y*
19.06%
10Y*
14.26%

BNB-USD

1D
0.91%
1M
-10.19%
YTD
-29.49%
6M
-32.13%
1Y
-7.11%
3Y*
36.86%
5Y*
10.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-5.58%147.62%21.10%-0.76%3.39%-12.85%45.85%16.36%-8.76%-2.14%
BNB-USD
BNB
-29.49%23.21%124.36%26.83%-51.86%1,277.47%170.06%126.63%-29.71%320.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ISLN.L and BNB-USD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISLN.L
ISLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

BNB-USD
BNB-USD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BNB-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNB-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and BNB (BNB-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISLN.LBNB-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.02

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

-0.13

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

-0.20

+4.56

ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the BNB-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISLN.L and BNB-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISLN.L drawdown since its inception was -76.69%, roughly equal to the maximum BNB-USD drawdown of -79.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISLN.L and BNB-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISLN.LBNB-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.69%

-79.74%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.83%

-56.24%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.83%

-56.24%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.83%

-69.89%

+26.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.57%

-53.42%

+12.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.73%

-38.71%

-15.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.70%

42.27%

-22.57%

Volatility

ISLN.L vs. BNB-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) is 15.90%, while BNB (BNB-USD) has a volatility of 17.28%. This indicates that ISLN.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNB-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISLN.LBNB-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.90%

17.28%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.92%

34.73%

+20.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.77%

44.38%

+13.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

50.42%

-14.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.08%

80.06%

-48.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISLN.L and BNB-USD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISLN.L and BNB-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer