ISGLX vs. VRTGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX).

ISGLX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008. VRTGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 25, 2011.

Performance

ISGLX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ISGLX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	20.26%	17.89%	-19.47%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	-6.77%	12.97%	15.26%	18.80%	-17.76%

Returns By Period

ISGLX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VRTGX

• 1D: -2.00%
• 1M: -10.13%
• YTD: -6.77%
• 6M: -5.62%
• 1Y: 18.63%
• 3Y*: 10.77%
• 5Y*: 0.82%
• 10Y*: 9.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISGLX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISGLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

ISGLX

Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund

VRTGX

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares

Return for Risk

ISGLX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTGX

VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISGLX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISGLX	VRTGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.45	—

Correlation

The correlation between ISGLX and VRTGX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ISGLX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison

ISGLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.77%	0.57%	0.62%	0.85%	0.78%	0.54%	0.53%	0.90%	0.85%	0.75%	1.07%	0.84%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ISGLX	VRTGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-41.97%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.80%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-14.80%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-10.53%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.30%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ISGLX	VRTGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.04%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	25.09%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.47%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.41%	—