ISGLX vs. NESGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISGLX (Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund) and NESGX (Needham Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISGLX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.85%/yr for NESGX.

Performance

ISGLX vs. NESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ISGLX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NESGX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 19.56%
• YTD: 80.30%
• 6M: 75.15%
• 1Y: 121.15%
• 3Y*: 32.75%
• 5Y*: 9.82%
• 10Y*: 20.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISGLX vs. NESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	20.26%	17.89%	-19.47%
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	80.30%	10.50%	12.76%	5.68%	-23.30%

Correlation

The correlation between ISGLX and NESGX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022	0.68

The correlation between ISGLX and NESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ISGLX vs. NESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NESGX

NESGX Risk / Return Rank: 94
NESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
NESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
NESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
NESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
NESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISGLX vs. NESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund (ISGLX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund (NESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISGLX	NESGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.61	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ISGLX	NESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-50.29%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.27%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.05%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.81%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-11.66%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.13%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ISGLX	NESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	30.26%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	29.27%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	25.83%	—

ISGLX vs. NESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISGLX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than NESGX's 1.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISGLX vs. NESGX - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISGLX nor NESGX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISGLX Columbia Integrated Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NESGX Needham Small Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.16%	25.09%	13.69%	8.43%	22.26%	8.94%	6.67%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISGLX and NESGX in my portfolio?

ISGLX and NESGX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.