ISFYX vs. DGTSX
ISFYX (Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Income Fund) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, ISFYX returned 6.64%/yr vs 5.28%/yr for DGTSX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.24% expense ratio.
Performance
ISFYX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ISFYX having a 4.33% return and DGTSX slightly lower at 4.23%. Over the past 10 years, ISFYX has outperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 6.64%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.28% annualized return.
ISFYX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 4.33%
- 6M
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 12.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- 6.64%
DGTSX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 4.08%
- 1Y
- 9.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.28%
ISFYX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISFYX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Income Fund | 4.33% | 11.73% | 10.23% | 9.30% | -14.11% | 7.80% | 14.11% | 16.18% | -6.15% | 9.35% |
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 4.23% | 8.39% | 7.43% | 8.93% | -8.06% | 10.20% | 7.29% | 9.80% | -1.85% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISFYX and DGTSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2005 | 0.88 |
The correlation between ISFYX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISFYX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank
ISFYX
DGTSX
ISFYX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Income Fund (ISFYX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISFYX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.57 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.76 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.17 | 16.52 | -5.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISFYX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISFYX drawdown since its inception was -31.63%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFYX and DGTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISFYX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.63% | -16.71% | -14.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.70% | -2.64% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.12% | -7.46% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.93% | -11.26% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.20% | -11.26% | -8.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.20% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.76% | -1.64% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.60% | +0.53% |
Volatility
ISFYX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison
Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Income Fund (ISFYX) has a higher volatility of 2.22% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.38%. This indicates that ISFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISFYX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.22% | 1.38% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.92% | 2.97% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.90% | 3.60% | +2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.35% | 5.98% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.93% | 5.24% | +2.69% |
ISFYX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISFYX and DGTSX have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISFYX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison
ISFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than DGTSX's 5.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 5.70% | 5.54% | 7.28% | 4.75% | 2.77% | 7.62% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.99% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.50% |
ISFYX Lord Abbett Multi-Asset Income Fund | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.73% | 3.36% | 2.71% | 5.43% | 3.87% | 2.80% | 4.01% | 4.00% | 4.30% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ISFYX and DGTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ISFYX has higher volatility (2.22%) compared to DGTSX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISFYX dropped -31.63% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.
DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISFYX and DGTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer