PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISFE.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF) and CP9G.L (Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ISFE.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex JPN Small Cap NR USD while CP9G.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISFE.L returned 11.11%/yr vs 5.57%/yr for CP9G.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISFE.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CP9G.L.

Performance

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (ISFE.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISFE.L achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than CP9G.L's 2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, ISFE.L has outperformed CP9G.L with an annualized return of 11.11%, while CP9G.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.57% annualized return.

ISFE.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.39%
YTD
24.56%
6M
24.82%
1Y
52.91%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
11.11%

CP9G.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
2.12%
6M
2.11%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
2.90%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
5.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISFE.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF		24.56%25.83%1.88%7.33%-11.93%14.85%24.79%6.15%-10.65%20.30%
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR		2.12%5.89%0.85%-0.56%-1.42%6.76%0.48%13.35%-5.17%14.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ISFE.L and CP9G.L is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2015

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between ISFE.L and CP9G.L has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ISFE.L
CP9G.L

Technology

32.6%
2.2%

Industrials

18.1%
11.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
4.7%

Real Estate

8.1%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
3.9%

Basic Materials

6.9%
10.4%

Financial Services

5.8%
48.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.1%
2.5%

Energy

2.2%

-

Utilities

1.3%
1.6%

Technology

ISFE.L
32.6%
CP9G.L
2.2%

Industrials

ISFE.L
18.1%
CP9G.L
11.3%

Healthcare

ISFE.L
8.5%
CP9G.L
4.7%

Real Estate

ISFE.L
8.1%
CP9G.L
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

ISFE.L
8.1%
CP9G.L
3.9%

Basic Materials

ISFE.L
6.9%
CP9G.L
10.4%

Financial Services

ISFE.L
5.8%
CP9G.L
48.0%

Consumer Defensive

ISFE.L
5.2%
CP9G.L
3.1%

Communication Services

ISFE.L
3.1%
CP9G.L
2.5%

Energy

ISFE.L
2.2%
CP9G.L

-

Utilities

ISFE.L
1.3%
CP9G.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF

Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR

Often compared with ISFE.L:
ISFE.L vs. SCHDISFE.L vs. FLINISFE.L vs. CSKR.LISFE.L vs. LDAG.LISFE.L vs. PADV.LISFE.L vs. IWDA.LISFE.L vs. HKOR.L
Often compared with CP9G.L:
CP9G.L vs. PADV.LCP9G.L vs. HMAF.LCP9G.L vs. HMXD.LCP9G.L vs. XMID.LCP9G.L vs. LAUU.LCP9G.L vs. IDAP.LCP9G.L vs. HSXJ.L

Return for Risk

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISFE.L
ISFE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ISFE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISFE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISFE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ISFE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISFE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
CP9G.L
CP9G.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (ISFE.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ISFE.LCP9G.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.89
0.33

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.61
0.56

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.07

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.08

0.50

+5.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.44

1.44

+19.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISFE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISFE.L and CP9G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ISFE.LCP9G.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

0.33

+2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.13

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.36

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.40

+0.12

Drawdowns

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISFE.L drawdown since its inception was -52.81%, which is greater than CP9G.L's maximum drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFE.L and CP9G.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISFE.LCP9G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.81%

-32.32%

-20.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-8.26%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.48%

-15.80%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.69%

-18.14%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.84%

-32.32%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-5.85%

+4.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-6.04%

-2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

2.91%

-0.33%

Volatility

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (ISFE.L) has a higher volatility of 6.71% compared to Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) at 4.27%. This indicates that ISFE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CP9G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISFE.LCP9G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.71%

4.27%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

10.42%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.23%

12.62%

+5.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

13.91%

+2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

15.70%

+1.55%

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISFE.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CP9G.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISFE.L vs. CP9G.L - Dividend Comparison

ISFE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while CP9G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISFE.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF		2.44%3.10%3.47%3.94%4.44%2.88%2.67%3.85%4.25%3.10%3.04%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISFE.L and CP9G.L have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CP9G.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CP9G.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for ISFE.L.

ISFE.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex JPN Small Cap NR USD, while CP9G.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for ISFE.L and 0.35% for CP9G.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISFE.L and CP9G.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer