ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L
ISFD.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)) and MVEU.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - ISFD.L tracks the FTSE 100 Index while MVEU.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISFD.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for MVEU.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISFD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MVEU.L.
Performance
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISFD.L is traded in USD, while MVEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MVEU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISFD.L achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than MVEU.L's 5.43% return.
ISFD.L
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.55%
MVEU.L
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 8.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 7.25%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.30%
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISFD.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 8.60% | 25.94% | 9.52% | 8.45% | 5.93% | 17.43% | -11.32% | 19.80% | -6.68% | 2.38% |
MVEU.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 5.43% | 26.66% | 4.87% | 14.16% | -17.92% | 13.38% | 4.65% | 20.04% | -8.31% | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISFD.L and MVEU.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ISFD.L and MVEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Consumer Defensive
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Industrials
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Healthcare
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Energy
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Basic Materials
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Utilities
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Communication Services
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Real Estate
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Technology
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISFD.L
MVEU.L
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISFD.L | MVEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.14 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 0.95 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 2.52 | +4.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISFD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, which is greater than MVEU.L's maximum drawdown of -31.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFD.L and MVEU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISFD.L | MVEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -31.96% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -8.83% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | -10.14% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.64% | -31.96% | +19.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -4.03% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -5.92% | +1.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.34% | -0.52% |
Volatility
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISFD.L | MVEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 2.90% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 8.92% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 10.87% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 14.37% | -1.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 14.29% | +1.32% |
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISFD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISFD.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISFD.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISFD.L and MVEU.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISFD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISFD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVEU.L.
ISFD.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISFD.L and 0.25% for MVEU.L.
Find the right allocation for ISFD.L and MVEU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer