ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L
ISFD.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc)) and MIBX.L (Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - ISFD.L tracks the FTSE 100 Index while MIBX.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISFD.L returned 13.12%/yr vs 20.59%/yr for MIBX.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISFD.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for MIBX.L.
Performance
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISFD.L is traded in USD, while MIBX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the MIBX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISFD.L achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than MIBX.L's 16.70% return.
ISFD.L
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 20.92%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.55%
MIBX.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 16.94%
- YTD
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 28.70%
- 5Y*
- 20.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.81%
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISFD.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 8.60% | 25.94% | 9.52% | 8.45% | 5.93% | 17.43% | -11.32% | 19.80% | -6.68% | 2.38% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 16.70% | 54.62% | 11.29% | 37.50% | -13.85% | 17.09% | 4.60% | 30.17% | -17.66% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISFD.L and MIBX.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ISFD.L and MIBX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISFD.L
MIBX.L
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) and Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISFD.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.33 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.86 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.41 | 9.92 | -2.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISFD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.97%, smaller than the maximum MIBX.L drawdown of -77.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFD.L and MIBX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISFD.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.97% | -77.16% | +43.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.85% | -11.20% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.64% | -17.50% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.64% | -35.60% | +22.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -1.47% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -54.63% | +50.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.24% | -0.42% |
Volatility
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) (ISFD.L) is 2.92%, while Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist (MIBX.L) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that ISFD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MIBX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISFD.L | MIBX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 4.26% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 14.32% | -4.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 17.16% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 21.05% | -8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 20.99% | -5.38% |
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISFD.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MIBX.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISFD.L vs. MIBX.L - Dividend Comparison
ISFD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MIBX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISFD.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF USD Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MIBX.L Lyxor FTSE MIB UCITS ETF - Dist | 3.14% | 3.68% | 3.93% | 3.73% | 3.88% | 2.09% | 1.55% | 4.02% | 4.05% | 2.75% | 3.56% | 3.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISFD.L and MIBX.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISFD.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISFD.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MIBX.L.
ISFD.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while MIBX.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ISFD.L and 0.35% for MIBX.L.
Find the right allocation for ISFD.L and MIBX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer