ISF.L vs. X7PS.L
ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and X7PS.L (Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - ISF.L tracks the FTSE 100 Index while X7PS.L tracks the STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L returned 8.64%/yr vs 16.34%/yr for X7PS.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISF.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for X7PS.L.
Performance
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISF.L is traded in GBp, while X7PS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the X7PS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 8.74% return, which is significantly lower than X7PS.L's 13.65% return. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L has underperformed X7PS.L with an annualized return of 8.64%, while X7PS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.
ISF.L
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 8.74%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 16.47%
- 5Y*
- 12.57%
- 10Y*
- 8.64%
X7PS.L
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 47.90%
- 3Y*
- 43.02%
- 5Y*
- 31.54%
- 10Y*
- 16.34%
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.74% | 25.97% | 9.28% | 7.81% | 4.83% | 17.68% | -11.67% | 17.11% | -8.96% | 13.10% |
X7PS.L Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 13.65% | 87.84% | 27.12% | 23.19% | 5.63% | 30.02% | -18.45% | 7.52% | -25.50% | 16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISF.L and X7PS.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2011 | 0.66 |
The correlation between ISF.L and X7PS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISF.L
X7PS.L
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISF.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.35 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 2.97 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.81 | 9.92 | -2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -45.00%, smaller than the maximum X7PS.L drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and X7PS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISF.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.00% | -56.34% | +11.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -16.07% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -18.22% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.69% | -30.73% | +18.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.13% | -56.34% | +22.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.54% | -2.58% | +1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -14.49% | +8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 4.81% | -2.02% |
Volatility
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) is 2.83%, while Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (X7PS.L) has a volatility of 5.51%. This indicates that ISF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISF.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 5.51% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 18.93% | -9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 22.34% | -11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.54% | 23.77% | -11.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.65% | 24.61% | -9.96% |
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than X7PS.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISF.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison
ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, while X7PS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.95% | 3.01% | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% |
X7PS.L Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISF.L and X7PS.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for X7PS.L.
ISF.L tracks FTSE 100 Index, while X7PS.L tracks STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks Index (EUR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ISF.L and 0.20% for X7PS.L.
Find the right allocation for ISF.L and X7PS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer