ISF.L vs. WENS.L
ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and WENS.L (iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while WENS.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ISF.L returned 14.88%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for WENS.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISF.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for WENS.L.
Performance
ISF.L vs. WENS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISF.L is traded in GBp, while WENS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the WENS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than WENS.L's 31.38% return.
ISF.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 21.32%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
WENS.L
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -0.63%
- YTD
- 31.38%
- 6M
- 26.68%
- 1Y
- 44.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISF.L vs. WENS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 6.13% | 25.97% | 9.28% | 7.81% | 5.67% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 31.38% | 3.24% | 2.09% | -2.00% | 17.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISF.L and WENS.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022 | 0.34 |
The correlation between ISF.L and WENS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISF.L vs. WENS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISF.L
WENS.L
ISF.L vs. WENS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISF.L | WENS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 2.99 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 9.66 | -1.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISF.L | WENS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.06 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.59 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
ISF.L vs. WENS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than WENS.L's maximum drawdown of -22.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and WENS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISF.L | WENS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.24% | -22.49% | -45.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -14.63% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -22.49% | +9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -7.62% | +3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.87% | -9.15% | -12.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 4.54% | -1.94% |
Volatility
ISF.L vs. WENS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) is 3.85%, while iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WENS.L) has a volatility of 7.96%. This indicates that ISF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WENS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISF.L | WENS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.85% | 7.96% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 18.19% | -8.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.73% | 21.33% | -10.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 21.49% | -8.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 21.49% | -6.65% |
ISF.L vs. WENS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than WENS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISF.L vs. WENS.L - Dividend Comparison
ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while WENS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.86% | 3.01% | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% |
WENS.L iShares MSCI World Energy Sector UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.75% | 3.61% | 1.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISF.L and WENS.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for WENS.L.
ISF.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while WENS.L is Energy Equities. ISF.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while WENS.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ISF.L and 0.25% for WENS.L.
Find the right allocation for ISF.L and WENS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer