PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISF.L vs. MSFT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISF.L vs. MSFT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) is Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L returned 9.81%/yr vs 25.03%/yr for MSFT. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ISF.L vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISF.L is traded in GBp, while MSFT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MSFT values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 9.81%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.03% annualized return.

ISF.L

1D
1.50%
1M
1.56%
YTD
7.07%
6M
10.11%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.81%

MSFT

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-18.43%
6M
-18.19%
1Y
-16.45%
3Y*
4.02%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
25.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISF.L vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISF.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)		7.07%25.97%9.28%7.81%4.83%17.68%-11.67%17.11%-8.96%13.10%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation		-18.43%7.35%14.90%50.28%-19.47%53.92%38.35%51.56%27.96%28.56%

Correlation

The correlation between ISF.L and MSFT is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007

0.29

The correlation between ISF.L and MSFT shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)

Microsoft Corporation

Often compared with ISF.L:
ISF.L vs. VUKE.LISF.L vs. HUKX.LISF.L vs. UKDV.LISF.L vs. XDAX.LISF.L vs. VUSA.ASISF.L vs. VOOISF.L vs. FEUI.L
Often compared with MSFT:
MSFT vs. AAPLMSFT vs. GOOGMSFT vs. AMZNMSFT vs. NVDAMSFT vs. SPYMSFT vs. METAMSFT vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

ISF.L vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISF.L
ISF.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ISF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISF.L vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ISF.LMSFTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.93
-0.64

+2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
-0.74

+3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

0.90

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

-0.48

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

-0.94

+8.83

ISF.L vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of -0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISF.L and MSFT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISF.L vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -45.00%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -40.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and MSFT.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISF.LMSFTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.00%

-40.05%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-34.18%

+25.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-34.18%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.69%

-34.18%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.13%

-34.18%

+0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-28.53%

+25.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-8.84%

+2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

17.53%

-14.85%

Volatility

ISF.L vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) is 3.51%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that ISF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISF.LMSFTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

10.61%

-7.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.53%

21.91%

-12.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

25.64%

-14.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.59%

25.92%

-13.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

27.30%

-12.46%

Dividends

ISF.L vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISF.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)		1.71%3.01%3.71%3.86%3.75%3.76%3.11%4.47%4.44%3.96%3.79%4.12%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation		0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISF.L and MSFT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISF.L and MSFT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer