PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISF.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISF.L vs. IITU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L returned 9.12%/yr vs 27.26%/yr for IITU.L. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISF.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.

Performance

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return. Over the past 10 years, ISF.L has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 9.12%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.26% annualized return.

ISF.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.75%
YTD
6.13%
6M
8.49%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
14.88%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
9.12%

IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISF.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)		6.13%25.97%9.28%7.81%4.83%17.68%-11.67%17.11%-8.96%13.10%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%25.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ISF.L and IITU.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2015

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between ISF.L and IITU.L has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ISF.L
IITU.L

Financial Services

24.8%

-

Industrials

13.8%
0.0%

Healthcare

13.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

12.8%

-

Energy

11.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

8.6%

-

Utilities

5.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%

-

Communication Services

2.6%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

0.8%
99.6%

Financial Services

ISF.L
24.8%
IITU.L

-

Industrials

ISF.L
13.8%
IITU.L
0.0%

Healthcare

ISF.L
13.8%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

ISF.L
12.8%
IITU.L

-

Energy

ISF.L
11.9%
IITU.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

ISF.L
8.6%
IITU.L

-

Utilities

ISF.L
5.3%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ISF.L
4.7%
IITU.L

-

Communication Services

ISF.L
2.6%
IITU.L

-

Real Estate

ISF.L
0.9%
IITU.L

-

Technology

ISF.L
0.8%
IITU.L
99.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with ISF.L:
ISF.L vs. VUKE.LISF.L vs. HUKX.LISF.L vs. UKDV.LISF.L vs. XDAX.LISF.L vs. VUSA.ASISF.L vs. VOOISF.L vs. FEUI.L
Often compared with IITU.L:
IITU.L vs. VGTIITU.L vs. CNX1.LIITU.L vs. VUAG.LIITU.L vs. XLKIITU.L vs. SMGB.LIITU.L vs. XLKQ.LIITU.L vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

ISF.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISF.L
ISF.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ISF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ISF.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.98
2.71

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.78
3.46

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.17

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

8.17

+0.01

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISF.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISF.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ISF.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.71

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

1.16

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.28

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

1.23

-1.07

Drawdowns

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -68.24%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and IITU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISF.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.24%

-28.03%

-40.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-16.76%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.69%

-28.03%

+15.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.69%

-28.03%

+15.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.13%

-28.03%

-6.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.90%

-2.89%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.87%

-5.14%

-16.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

6.51%

-3.91%

Volatility

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) is 3.85%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that ISF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISF.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

7.01%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.31%

14.45%

-5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

19.60%

-8.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.56%

21.94%

-9.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.84%

21.31%

-6.47%

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ISF.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISF.L
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)		2.86%3.01%3.71%3.86%3.75%3.76%3.11%4.47%4.44%3.96%3.79%4.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISF.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.

ISF.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. ISF.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ISF.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISF.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer