ISF.L vs. GSPX.L
ISF.L (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist)) and GSPX.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISF.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while GSPX.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISF.L returned 11.88%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for GSPX.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISF.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GSPX.L.
Performance
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISF.L is traded in GBp, while GSPX.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GSPX.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISF.L achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than GSPX.L's 8.24% return.
ISF.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.88%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
GSPX.L
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 6M
- 9.38%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- —
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.07% | 25.97% | 9.28% | 7.81% | 4.83% | 17.68% | -11.67% | 17.11% | -9.98% |
GSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 8.24% | 17.16% | 24.72% | 24.87% | -20.64% | 28.96% | 15.11% | 27.76% | -7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISF.L and GSPX.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between ISF.L and GSPX.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (3 years) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Industrials
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Healthcare
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Consumer Defensive
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Energy
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Basic Materials
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Utilities
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Communication Services
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Real Estate
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Technology
ISF.L
GSPX.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISF.L
GSPX.L
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISF.L | GSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 2.86 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 12.14 | -4.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISF.L drawdown since its inception was -45.00%, which is greater than GSPX.L's maximum drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISF.L and GSPX.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISF.L | GSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.00% | -34.98% | -10.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.37% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.69% | -18.97% | +6.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.69% | -25.80% | +13.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -2.12% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.45% | -5.61% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.98% | +0.70% |
Volatility
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISF.L) is 3.51%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GSPX.L) has a volatility of 4.22%. This indicates that ISF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSPX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISF.L | GSPX.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 4.22% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 9.03% | +0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.94% | 11.98% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.59% | 16.12% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 17.69% | -2.85% |
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISF.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GSPX.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISF.L vs. GSPX.L - Dividend Comparison
ISF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than GSPX.L's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSPX.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.82% | 0.89% | 0.99% | 1.15% | 1.40% | 0.96% | 1.31% | 1.50% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISF.L iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.71% | 3.01% | 3.71% | 3.86% | 3.75% | 3.76% | 3.11% | 4.47% | 4.44% | 3.96% | 3.79% | 4.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISF.L and GSPX.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISF.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISF.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GSPX.L.
ISF.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while GSPX.L is S&P 500. ISF.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while GSPX.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ISF.L and 0.10% for GSPX.L.
Find the right allocation for ISF.L and GSPX.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer