PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISDW.L is traded in USD, while SBUY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBUY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISDW.L achieves a 19.45% return, which is significantly higher than SBUY.L's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ISDW.L has underperformed SBUY.L with an annualized return of 11.23%, while SBUY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.24% annualized return.


ISDW.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
8.36%
YTD
19.45%
6M
20.58%
1Y
36.72%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
11.23%

SBUY.L

1D
0.94%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.22%
6M
9.15%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
21.69%
5Y*
9.80%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISDW.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS
19.45%19.35%5.72%23.61%-11.80%21.40%8.33%21.16%-9.55%19.36%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
6.22%30.78%12.73%15.23%-11.50%20.26%11.75%30.39%-14.45%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ISDW.L and SBUY.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2014

0.78

The correlation between ISDW.L and SBUY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISDW.L
SBUY.L

Technology

43.8%
7.6%

Industrials

12.7%
11.0%

Energy

10.9%
17.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
5.5%

Basic Materials

9.6%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
1.9%

Utilities

1.0%
2.2%

Communication Services

0.4%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.5%

Financial Services

0.0%
32.9%

Technology

ISDW.L
43.8%
SBUY.L
7.6%

Industrials

ISDW.L
12.7%
SBUY.L
11.0%

Energy

ISDW.L
10.9%
SBUY.L
17.1%

Healthcare

ISDW.L
10.2%
SBUY.L
5.5%

Basic Materials

ISDW.L
9.6%
SBUY.L
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ISDW.L
7.1%
SBUY.L
15.8%

Consumer Defensive

ISDW.L
3.7%
SBUY.L
1.9%

Utilities

ISDW.L
1.0%
SBUY.L
2.2%

Communication Services

ISDW.L
0.4%
SBUY.L
4.1%

Real Estate

ISDW.L
0.2%
SBUY.L
0.5%

Financial Services

ISDW.L
0.0%
SBUY.L
32.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISDW.L
ISDW.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ISDW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SBUY.L
SBUY.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBUY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) and Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISDW.LSBUY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.29

3.40

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.43

11.50

+6.94

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISDW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the SBUY.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISDW.L and SBUY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISDW.LSBUY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.13

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.62

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.69

-0.23

Drawdowns

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISDW.L drawdown since its inception was -44.87%, which is greater than SBUY.L's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDW.L and SBUY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISDW.LSBUY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.87%

-38.71%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.91%

-7.06%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-16.45%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-27.07%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.77%

-38.71%

+4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.41%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.26%

-5.78%

+0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.09%

-0.10%

Volatility

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS (ISDW.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF (SBUY.L) at 2.96%. This indicates that ISDW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBUY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISDW.LSBUY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

2.96%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

8.43%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.98%

11.28%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.72%

15.86%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

16.80%

-1.13%

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISDW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than SBUY.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISDW.L vs. SBUY.L - Dividend Comparison

ISDW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SBUY.L's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISDW.L
iShares MSCI World Islamic UCITS
0.95%1.11%1.38%1.56%2.02%1.47%1.38%1.80%1.87%1.54%1.70%1.77%
SBUY.L
Invesco Global Buyback Achievers UCITS ETF
1.69%1.86%1.80%1.73%1.91%1.20%1.62%1.90%1.31%1.22%1.60%1.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISDW.L and SBUY.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISDW.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISDW.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SBUY.L.

ISDW.L tracks MSCI World Islamic Index, while SBUY.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISDW.L and 0.39% for SBUY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISDW.L and SBUY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer