ISDU.L vs. UC46.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISDU.L (iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF) and UC46.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ISDU.L tracks the MSCI USA Islamic Index while UC46.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISDU.L returned 12.42%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for UC46.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISDU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for UC46.L.

Performance

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ISDU.L is traded in USD, while UC46.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UC46.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISDU.L achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than UC46.L's 13.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ISDU.L has underperformed UC46.L with an annualized return of 12.42%, while UC46.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.49% annualized return.

ISDU.L

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 10.88%
• YTD: 22.76%
• 6M: 23.83%
• 1Y: 41.31%
• 3Y*: 20.09%
• 5Y*: 14.34%
• 10Y*: 12.42%

UC46.L

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 7.50%
• YTD: 13.41%
• 6M: 13.67%
• 1Y: 25.63%
• 3Y*: 19.58%
• 5Y*: 11.34%
• 10Y*: 14.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF	22.76%	16.32%	9.36%	25.84%	-11.90%	29.59%	6.85%	20.62%	-6.04%	14.03%
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	13.41%	10.55%	19.11%	31.60%	-25.42%	31.42%	22.22%	30.21%	-4.84%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ISDU.L and UC46.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2013	0.85

The correlation between ISDU.L and UC46.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISDU.L	UC46.L
Technology	49.7%	44.2%
Energy	12.3%	-
Healthcare	10.8%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	11.1%
Industrials	7.7%	9.9%
Basic Materials	5.5%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	5.0%
Utilities	0.7%	0.7%
Communication Services	0.4%	3.6%
Real Estate	0.1%	2.8%
Financial Services	-	12.0%

Return for Risk

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISDU.L

ISDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 90
ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ISDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ISDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ISDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ISDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 89

UC46.L

UC46.L Risk / Return Rank: 62
UC46.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UC46.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
UC46.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
UC46.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
UC46.L Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISDU.L	UC46.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	1.99	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.38	2.95	+1.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.35	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.96	2.40	+3.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.96	9.07	+10.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is higher than the UC46.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISDU.L and UC46.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISDU.L	UC46.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.16	1.99	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.66	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77	0.85	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.81	-0.16

Drawdowns

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISDU.L drawdown since its inception was -37.79%, which is greater than UC46.L's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDU.L and UC46.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISDU.L	UC46.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.79%	-33.01%	-4.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.90%	-10.63%	+3.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.98%	-20.73%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.98%	-32.22%	+10.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.01%	-33.01%	0.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.70%	-0.54%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-5.18%	+0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	2.82%	-0.76%

Volatility

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.10% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC46.L) at 4.01%. This indicates that ISDU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC46.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISDU.L	UC46.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.10%	4.01%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.96%	9.73%	+0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.01%	12.85%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.17%	17.22%	-1.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.18%	17.00%	-0.82%

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than UC46.L's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISDU.L vs. UC46.L - Dividend Comparison

ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than UC46.L's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF	0.62%	0.74%	0.90%	1.10%	1.52%	1.01%	1.39%	1.37%	1.49%	1.38%	1.34%	1.43%
UC46.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	0.42%	0.80%	0.72%	0.75%	0.86%	0.64%	0.87%	1.03%	1.02%	1.23%	1.18%	1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISDU.L and UC46.L in my portfolio?

ISDU.L and UC46.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ISDU.L or UC46.L?

On fees, UC46.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISDU.L or UC46.L?

UC46.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.

What is the main difference between ISDU.L and UC46.L?

ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index, while UC46.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISDU.L and 0.22% for UC46.L.