PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCGX vs. TADAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) and Transamerica US Growth (TADAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISCGX having a 10.04% return and TADAX slightly higher at 10.15%. Over the past 10 years, ISCGX has underperformed TADAX with an annualized return of 8.81%, while TADAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return.


ISCGX

1D
1.27%
1M
6.48%
YTD
10.04%
6M
6.99%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
8.81%

TADAX

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.69%
YTD
10.15%
6M
9.07%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
23.80%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
16.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCGX
Transamerica Small Cap Growth
10.04%-3.41%6.12%20.01%-30.85%18.23%32.20%29.47%-7.71%15.56%
TADAX
Transamerica US Growth
10.15%17.09%28.81%41.45%-31.60%20.65%35.85%39.41%-0.52%28.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCGX and TADAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.79

The correlation between ISCGX and TADAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCGX vs. TADAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCGX
ISCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ISCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TADAX
TADAX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TADAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TADAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TADAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TADAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TADAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) and Transamerica US Growth (TADAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCGXTADAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.31

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.81

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

6.19

-2.76

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the TADAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCGX and TADAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCGXTADAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

1.78

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.57

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.77

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.71

-0.26

Drawdowns

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCGX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, roughly equal to the maximum TADAX drawdown of -39.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCGX and TADAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCGXTADAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-39.29%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.78%

-16.48%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.12%

-24.04%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.22%

-39.29%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-39.29%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.85%

-0.23%

-13.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.21%

-6.40%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.28%

4.80%

-0.52%

Volatility

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Small Cap Growth (ISCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to Transamerica US Growth (TADAX) at 4.08%. This indicates that ISCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TADAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCGXTADAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

4.08%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.46%

12.68%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.72%

16.72%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.35%

23.14%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

21.95%

+1.04%

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TADAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCGX vs. TADAX - Dividend Comparison

ISCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, more than TADAX's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCGX
Transamerica Small Cap Growth
14.06%15.47%12.92%4.61%4.29%11.50%8.30%6.94%11.71%10.40%121.18%9.14%
TADAX
Transamerica US Growth
4.17%4.59%16.73%3.66%4.60%13.56%9.73%8.29%12.42%10.92%2.29%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISCGX and TADAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCGX has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to TADAX (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCGX dropped -39.22% vs TADAX's -39.29%.

TADAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCGX and TADAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer