ISCF vs. IBIT
ISCF (iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISCF is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ISCF returned 21.96% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISCF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
ISCF vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
ISCF
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISCF vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 7.28% | 33.65% | 6.67% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCF and IBIT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCF vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ISCF
IBIT
ISCF vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.86 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | -0.79 | +2.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.28 | -1.36 | +8.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | -0.89 | +2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.30 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
ISCF vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.79% | -49.36% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.34% | -49.36% | +38.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -48.10% | +45.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -16.02% | +7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 28.44% | -25.42% |
Volatility
ISCF vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) is 4.33%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that ISCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCF | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 9.50% | -5.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 34.44% | -22.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.39% | 43.73% | -29.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 50.19% | -33.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 50.19% | -32.75% |
ISCF vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISCF vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISCF iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF | 3.50% | 3.76% | 4.29% | 3.94% | 2.73% | 3.93% | 2.30% | 2.87% | 2.14% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISCF and IBIT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to ISCF (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCF dropped -40.79% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, ISCF leads with 21.96% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 21.96% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.
ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
ISCF is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISCF and 0.25% for IBIT.
ISCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCF and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer