ISBG vs. SETH
ISBG (IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF) and SETH (ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ISBG is actively managed, while SETH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. ISBG charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SETH.
Performance
ISBG vs. SETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISBG
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -30.62%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SETH
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 32.48%
- YTD
- 43.11%
- 6M
- 49.04%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISBG vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | -37.49% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 47.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISBG and SETH is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISBG vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank
ISBG
SETH
ISBG vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISBG | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.96 | -0.44 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
ISBG vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISBG drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, smaller than the maximum SETH drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISBG and SETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISBG | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -80.74% | +37.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.92% | -60.69% | +17.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.49% | -54.80% | +31.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 35.78% | — |
Volatility
ISBG vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISBG | SETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.17% | 68.46% | +6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.17% | 69.49% | +5.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.17% | 69.49% | +5.68% |
ISBG vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISBG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISBG vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison
ISBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.65%, less than SETH's 10.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | 9.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SETH ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF | 10.75% | 7.01% | 3.44% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISBG and SETH have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISBG.
SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.75%, compared with 9.65% for ISBG.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISBG and 0.95% for SETH.
Find the right allocation for ISBG and SETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer