ISBG vs. BTCZ
ISBG (IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.82, they often move in opposite directions. ISBG charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
ISBG vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISBG
- 1D
- -11.39%
- 1M
- -40.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- 10.70%
- 1M
- 77.17%
- YTD
- 54.87%
- 6M
- 58.86%
- 1Y
- 67.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISBG vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | -44.61% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 69.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISBG and BTCZ is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISBG vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
ISBG
BTCZ
ISBG vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF (ISBG) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISBG | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.04 | -0.53 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
ISBG vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISBG drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISBG and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISBG | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.42% | -91.06% | +41.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.42% | -75.02% | +25.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.77% | -73.73% | +49.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 25.77% | — |
Volatility
ISBG vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISBG | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 67.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.91% | 88.13% | -11.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.91% | 97.32% | -20.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.91% | 97.32% | -20.41% |
ISBG vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISBG has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISBG vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
ISBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.89%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
ISBG IncomeSTKd 1x Bitcoin & 1x Gold Premium ETF | 10.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISBG and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BTCZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BTCZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ISBG.
ISBG has the higher dividend yield at 10.89%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.
They also come from different issuers: Quantify Funds and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for ISBG and 0.95% for BTCZ.
Find the right allocation for ISBG and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer