PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IS3S.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IS3S.DE is traded in EUR, while IWFQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFQ.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3S.DE achieves a 34.68% return, which is significantly higher than IWFQ.L's 10.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IS3S.DE having a 12.98% annualized return and IWFQ.L not far behind at 12.37%.


IS3S.DE

1D
2.88%
1M
5.58%
YTD
34.68%
6M
37.30%
1Y
63.13%
3Y*
25.47%
5Y*
17.18%
10Y*
12.98%

IWFQ.L

1D
1.18%
1M
2.78%
YTD
10.28%
6M
11.32%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
11.27%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3S.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF
34.68%25.13%11.36%15.62%-4.81%30.35%-12.53%22.01%-10.32%7.66%
IWFQ.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS
10.28%1.80%24.66%21.68%-14.21%33.31%4.90%33.87%-3.54%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2014

0.77

The correlation between IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3S.DE
IS3S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IS3S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IWFQ.L
IWFQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWFQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IS3S.DE) and iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3S.DEIWFQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.36

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.20

3.10

+7.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.08

13.11

+23.98

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3S.DE Sharpe Ratio is 4.29, which is higher than the IWFQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3S.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum IWFQ.L drawdown of -41.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3S.DEIWFQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.19%

-41.48%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-6.51%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.78%

-20.22%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.78%

-20.22%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.19%

-31.50%

-3.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

0.00%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.96%

-10.55%

+3.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

1.54%

+0.14%

Volatility

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IS3S.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to iShares MSCI World Quality Factor UCITS (IWFQ.L) at 2.28%. This indicates that IS3S.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3S.DEIWFQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

2.28%

+3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

7.42%

+4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

10.46%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.97%

19.75%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.66%

17.86%

-1.20%

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.30%.


Dividends

IS3S.DE vs. IWFQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3S.DE nor IWFQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.

IS3S.DE tracks MSCI World Enhanced Value, while IWFQ.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3S.DE and IWFQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer